From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Linux is a family of open source Unix-like
operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first
released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in
a Linux distribution (or distro for short). Distributions include the Linux
kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided
by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name,
but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the
importance of GNU software, causing some controversy. ### Rules * Posts must be
relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
* No misinformation * No NSFW content * No hate speech, bigotry, etc ### Related
Communities * !opensource@lemmy.ml [/c/opensource@lemmy.ml]
[https://lemmy.ml/c/opensource] * !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
[/c/libre_culture@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/libre_culture] *
!technology@lemmy.ml [/c/technology@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/technology] *
!libre_hardware@lemmy.ml [/c/libre_hardware@lemmy.ml]
[https://lemmy.ml/c/libre_hardware] Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder
[https://www.iconfinder.com/pocike], licensed under CC BY 3.0
[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]
Looking for some suggestions, preferably with existing tested compatibility with the Framework laptop hardware so I can do more well rounded research. I’m the most familiar with Ubuntu and CentOS. Picked Ubuntu initially for mid 2000s nostalgia purposes but it’s time to move on.
EDIT: As some people have pointed out, “more privacy oriented” was probably not the best phrase to use here. I am looking to move off of a Linux OS with corporate sponsorship and also looking forward to exploring Linux OSes that are privacy focused.
I mean, they didn’t exactly provide support for the original argument, so I don’t expect the dissent to provide support either… both are just funny opinions
I’ll do it! Debian’s repos are dramatically different from Ubuntu’s. While they share lineage and have a lot of similarities, you could say that about any debian based distro. It’s much more accurate to say Mint is ubuntu - bs, as they’re actually very close to each other. Personally I don’t like the philosophies of Debian or ubuntu in terms of how they structure their repos/package versions, but they do differ. And these days, that’s the majority of what differentiates a distro. The package manager, the repos, and the defaults.
Care to elaborate, instead of just calling someone wrong with nothing to back up why you believe they’re wrong?
I mean, they didn’t exactly provide support for the original argument, so I don’t expect the dissent to provide support either… both are just funny opinions
I’ll do it! Debian’s repos are dramatically different from Ubuntu’s. While they share lineage and have a lot of similarities, you could say that about any debian based distro. It’s much more accurate to say Mint is ubuntu - bs, as they’re actually very close to each other. Personally I don’t like the philosophies of Debian or ubuntu in terms of how they structure their repos/package versions, but they do differ. And these days, that’s the majority of what differentiates a distro. The package manager, the repos, and the defaults.
I made a few debmirror distro mirrors from Ubuntu and Debian recently but failed to see a dramatic difference. Can you explain what you mean? Thanks.
Not really, no.