I like that it’s possible, but I think it should be treated like a permission with a user accessible toggle in settings for each app.

Tech bros have ruined the prestige of a lot of titles. Software “Engineer”, Systems “Architect”, Data “Scientist”, Computer “Wizard”, etc.

You can but if you want to get a perfect score at the evaluation after year 2 you need to complete the community center and meet a few other requirements. You can reevaluate at any time after the 2 years but it’s more interesting to do it within the original time limit.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. Stardew Valley is the most anxiety filled game I’ve ever played. 100s of goals, each with many codependencies and individual time constraints, all to be completed within a 2 year window.

For a 16k context window using q4_k_s quants with llamacpp it requires around 32GB. You can get away with less using smaller context windows and lower accuracy quants but quality will degrade and each chain of thought requires a few thousand tokens so you will lose previous messages quickly.

Everyone on my friends list who owns Terraria has well over 1000 hours. It’s as close to a “perfect” game as you can get.

Perfect AI boyfriends are the bigger threat to young men

exFAT is still the best format for multiplatform compatibility so it’s good to see that it’s still getting maintained.

Seeing microsd cards left out in the open around an animal gives me anxiety. You might accidentally install linux on your cat.

Now everyone gets to hand over their ids to the tech companies.

Nobody is saying nothing, so everybody is saying something, or at least that’s what is sounds like with tinnitus.

The issue isn’t really “too busy with jobs”, it’s not having enough monetary resources to take care of a large non-working population. The fear with AI is that it will take the comfy, high paying office jobs and demote the non c-suites down to manual labor. Unless corporate taxes are increased dramatically (unlikely) many of the young working class will be stretched thin trying to pay for their parent’s care.

“Don’t shoot! I’m with the science team!”

If everyone has access to the model it becomes much easier to find obfuscation methods and validate them. It becomes an uphill battle. It’s unfortunate but it’s an inherent limitation of most safeguards.

Of course it was political retribution and not the whole unregistered securities and gambling market thing.

Anthropic released an api for the same thing last week.

We’re Costco guys

I’d guess the 3 key staff members leaving all at once without notice had something to do with it.

This is actually pretty smart because it switches the context of the action. Most intermediate users avoid clicking random executables by instinct but this is different enough that it doesn’t immediately trigger that association and response.

All signs point to this being a finetune of gpt4o with additional chain of thought steps before the final answer. It has exactly the same pitfalls as the existing model (9.11>9.8 tokenization error, failing simple riddles, being unable to assert that the user is wrong, etc.). It’s still a transformer and it’s still next token prediction. They hide the thought steps to mask this fact and to prevent others from benefiting from all of the finetuning data they paid for.