

2·
19 days agoIt’s in there in the section on “emoluments”. Problem is SCOTUS has already ruled “no foul, play on”
It’s in there in the section on “emoluments”. Problem is SCOTUS has already ruled “no foul, play on”
Not below my expectations. I expect this fucker to tank everything he can.
Yes, that’s an cheap shot and an insult to knobs everywhere.
We tariff you infinity plus one.
To be clear, this theory doesn’t invalidate what you said.
Why not both?