

The truth is though that ultimately, politicians are gonna be malleable to those who are going to vote
No, they are not. A single donation from a billionaire would buy more press to get more voters from name recognition than a million working class supporters. And if the politician betrays his base, the most he can fear is losing reelection, and even this is not assured. If a politician goes against billionaires, he is going to be smeared, harassed and have his opposition funded. This ensures that the only politicians in any significant elections are already guaranteed to serve billionaires.
Thinking of politics in terms of good guys and bad guys is kindergarten-level.
This is literally Budenny.
Consistency of an axiomatic system that contains arithmetic can be proven in this system if and only if it is inconsistent.
https://www.lmfdb.org/ for people deep into analytic number theory rabbit hole.
Democrats won’t abandon norms and traditions, because they play a good cop to Republicans’ bad cop. They are all in one big club and you aren’t in it.
They are mined, actually, although production fell during the war.
No, Democratic Party would throw an election rather than move an inch to the left.
I too support destroying American pharmaceutical industry.
They sound exactly like someone who understands the role of the US.
It is not a failed policy - the cruelty is the point.
For first several months the war was extremely unpopular, but sanctions and discrimination against Russians did orders of magnitude more to make people think of the West as the enemy than the dumb state propaganda.
Unhinged bullshit like this did more to make people support Putin than any propaganda he could spit.
Crassus would be proud.
I was born.
Lmao, is this ДМБ reference?
Trump is literally the harm reduction candidate now.