Have you checked if there is any Obsidian plugin that can do the trick?

I do exactly the same. It’s not foolproof but it’s better than nothing. I remember, almost a decade ago, when I discovered that rm on mac didn’t accept flags as last arguments… I hope they changed that behavior

Some shells provide ways to prevent some commands to be added to the history

They are right 🤣

More than a decade ago I bought SUSE enterprise for a couple of years just to support the project. Never needed any assistance so I’m not sure about a different experience. BTW The box was nice 🤣

If you are able to see every recipe I’d rule out data corruption. If the issue arise only when try to create a new recipe (or editing an old one) the usual thing to check are permissions. Don’t zip but use some tools to maintain permissions (tar, rsync, etc) and try again

I didn’t completely switch, koreader is installed side by side with the official software but it has a lot more feature and it suite my needs. Eg. I’m a developer and I wrote an Obsidian plugin to retrieve all my highlights and notes from koreader

On Android I like Moon+ Reader, on my Kobo I installed koreader

I’m an avid Obsidian user but I didn’t know about Matcha. It’s really cool

I want to jockely answer: curl but there are seriously good cli rss readers out there:

• https://newsboat.org/
• https://github.com/guyfedwards/nom

If you want a way to self host git (not github) repositories you can check this list https://www.slant.co/topics/1440/~best-self-hosted-web-based-git-repository-managers

I don’t think it’s even possibile. How do you propose such a feature to works like? Showing all the comments from all the post known to your instance (so showing ALL the posts)?

It wasn’t meant to be a correction … I just learned about this project so I’d just want to know more

Are you sure about Paaster supporting Markdonw? I only see syntax highlighting https://paaster.io/GtlseaIIhqtfcsZV1C8sS#BgT9miwSaeKzMLQ-Ch6d3KZlgfCmIR32dpYr06HXYTw

I just copy&pasted their README in chatgpt asking for a comparison (so there may be allucinations)

Both PrivateBin and Paaster are “pastebin” tools that allow users to share snippets of text or code online. Both emphasize privacy and security, encrypting data at the local level in the user’s browser before sending it to the server. However, there are several key differences between the two services:

1. Design and User Interface: While PrivateBin self-identifies as a minimalist pastebin, Paaster seems to put an emphasis on user experience, offering features like file drag & drop and a paste history.

2. Features: Both offer basic features like password protection and the option to delete data after reading, but PrivateBin also offers features like the ability to have anonymous or nicknamed discussions, Markdown formatting support, code syntax highlighting, and the ability to upload files. On the other hand, Paaster offers a paste history feature, PWA support, and i18n.

3. Trust: PrivateBin warns users not to blindly trust the server administrator, whereas Paaster advises users to either host their service or use a trusted hosting service.

4. Implementation and Maintenance: Paaster seems more developer-oriented, with API documentation, a CLI tool, and support for Vercel and Docker. PrivateBin, however, also has a developer and installation guide.

5. Hosting Options: Paaster seems more geared towards self-hosting, with detailed instructions for use with Docker and options for use with external storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage. PrivateBin does not provide specific hosting details in the provided text.

6. Security: Both use end-to-end encryption, but they use different encryption algorithms. Paaster uses XChaCha20-Poly1305, while PrivateBin uses 256-bit AES in Galois Counter mode.

These are just some of the key differences between the two services. Both have their strengths and unique points, and the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs of the user or organization.

I’m incline to say that there’s no way. I order to have secure payments you have to secure each and every step of the process. Without a big corporation under those steps no one in his right mind will gamble with payments

and, even if you scan them, how do you know that a port knocker isn’t there waiting to the secret knock?

the article say some bullshit … “platforms will be required to verify the ages of all minors” ok, fine … but wait … how can they do that??? Do they have to asks for every users worldwide their documents? And suspend any users that doesn’t prove he’s not a minor from one of those states?

having a redundant system is feasible (I’m just a dev, not an architect so don’t take my words for granted) but it have to be designed and putted together … and prices are gonna skyrocket

No. The “single source of truth” is the instance hosting the community. If it goes down the community itself goes down with the ship. The only way to prevent it is to have a IT infrastructure that can provide redundancy