No I do not. I don’t think they support genocide either, but they do support a country committing genocide, which is absolutely disgusting too. But I’m perhaps splitting hairs there.

I make no distinction between the two, and I consider your hair splitting to be an attempt to downplay it.

Do you think they support a country committing genocide because people are voting for them?

I think they support genocide regardless of who voted for them. I think they do so for the sheer love of it. If you support genocide you lose the benefit of the doubt.

Do you suppose genocide has always been something Democrats were so eager to support?

I don’t think I made any claims that this was a fluke. If so, it wasn’t meant to be received as such. I’m merely saying that one election is not enough to go on.

And now that I’ve cited multiple elections, can we put that “we only have one election” thing to bed?

And I don’t know enough to make any claims about the history. I’m merely saying we have to look at the history to make any claims. This type of theorem can’t be based on one election. That’s all I’m saying.

How convenient that you only know one election when I bring up the previous two cycles of the phenomenon I described, but up until this moment, you were certain that this one election was a fluke.

He’s a US citizen, isn’t he?

For one election?

Which of GWB’s rightward policies did Obama undo? Which of Reagan/Bush’s policies did Clinton undo?

You’re defending a rightward shift that has been going on for decades.

Does the rightward shift that has resulted in the “good” party supporting genocide indicate stability to you?

Welp, you just saw that “damage control” has a limit. People will stay home if they see insufficient difference between the two pro-genocide parties.

Sorry, I thought I made it clear. What Biden did when he supported genocide for you is not “damage control” even though you love him for it.

and the Biden administration did more to restrict sales than most

Oh? Provide examples.

How many times do you want to move to the right and not back to the left? How many more times will it take to satisfy you?

Well, shouting at the electorate to shut up and love genocide because it’s the “lesser” evil didn’t work.

Was supporting genocide “damage control?”

Here’s the question I asked.

Pray tell, how is strengthening unions & workers rights

Strikebreaking and photo ops didn’t strengthen shit.

forgiving student loans

Was the only bright spot in his presidency.

Now how was supporting a genocide “left?” I mean, it may be to your left. Maybe you want active participation?

people don’t vote, democrats lose, they think it’s because they’re too far left and move further to the right.

People vote, Democrats win, they think it’s because they moved to the right and so they move further to the right. The sun comes up in the morning and they move further to the right.

Biden will likely end up as one of the top 5 most progressive presidents ever.

He’s not even in the top 5 now.

As good as that video is, he ignores the strength elections have as damage control.

Was supporting genocide “damage control?”

OK, what else do you suggest?

I suggest that the party take the fucking hint and move to the left. But that’s not an option you will consider.

Then they better fucking learn quick, huh?

Ah yes, so the best option is to not vote and let them succeed unimpeded.

The best option is to scream at anyone who isn’t fucking delighted that your side of the party has moved so far to the right that they’re supporting genocide.

No one can gripe about your shit wing of the party.