Why did they get review bombed?

I’m curious why the mouth needs to be open. Probably to somehow avoid your lungs taking damage from the pressure wave?

Well that highly depends on location. I think that’s illegal in most of Europe

Just spent a couple of hours playing gatekeeper with some friends. That was good fun, so if you like top down Rogue like looter shooters, give it a try

Since Greenland Imports a lot and doesn’t really have a lot of export, a big part of the trip would be sailed anyway, just with empty containers

This might be it. Depending on how the sound is mixed the voice might cancel itself out since it’s usually similar between left and right and the instruments are not. So they will not experience the same interference

Well that’s annoying. This is the first time I hear about this game and it looks kinda good. I hope the studio can turn around and restart development at some point

Well that’s kinda worrying

Testosterone

Post it here as well👺

It’s a shame the new season has been postponed for a long time though.

Looking forward to the development of ogue core and I really hope there is some cross over between the two games

Drake

I like the point about LLMs interpolating data while humans extrapolate. I think that’s sums up a key difference in “learning”. It’s also an interesting point that we anthropomorphise ML models by using words such as learning or training, but I wonder if there are other better words to use. Fitting?

Denmark doesn’t have unrestricted free speech. Censorship is against the constitution but hate speech, inciting violence or defamation is illegal and until 2017 blasphemy was illegal. There is some legal basis for punishing speech that is bringing the country into danger or is severely insulting another nation. I am not a lawyer so I don’t know if it’s applicable or if it will hold up in court.

Note that the government does not want to ban burning books. Just prevent/punish doing it as a provocation against another country.

I also want to stress that I am not defending the Danish government or the book burners. I just want to bring some needed nuance to the discussion

Which is also what the article is arguing. As soon as a majority of users are subject to this the websites can discriminate. If only safari does this it’s still bad but not very bad

Ah that makes sense. Thanks!

Wouldn’t an a area of low gravitational pull create a hill instead of a valley in the ocean?