Infiltrated_ad8271

I am addressing the journalist’s claims (starting even in the subhead), which is pertinent. If sexists don’t like it and are looking for excuses, that’s their problem.

Extorting and profiting from private information is not sexist. Pretending that it is something that happens to women because they are women, that it doesn’t happen to men, or that only men do it, is sexist.

They are against things like mandatory military service for men only, women-only universities, women’s quotas, and other things that create a noticeable disadvantage in their daily lives, in one of the most ultra-capitalist societies in the world.

You know, against things that are effective gender discrimination and that feminism advocates. But yeah, their reaction and rise can only be explained by them being terrible men, no doubt.

Wow, so many hoaxes and bullshit for such a short comment.

That seems quite reasonable. Even leaving aside the propaganda, they cannot recognize what they have lost if they do not remember it.

Moreover, in the case of female mutilation, it is also mostly approved and advocated by women.

deleted by creator

too killed women and children

Frequently this shit is said I always wonder, are women equivalent to children, is it okay to kill men, or both?

The study may help settle a long-standing debate about the existence of reliable sex differences in the brain.

How many studies on these lines must appear before this “debate” is overcome? It is even a truism! That we are a tabula rasa without sexual dimorphism is as absurd as biological determinism.

They didn’t kick out that minority who ran racist businesses, they kicked out all the 288k people who reneged on their “duty” to go kill ukrainians and die for putin’s aspirations.

Don’t misinterpret this as a slight to the main topic, but I am unable to imagine 110 people living together in one house.

Yep, I guess the covid made it a visceral, identitarian issue. They’re not good allies, but hey, if they have to be alienated, it’s a reassurance that they’re on the right side.

Being confrontational will only alienate them from your position and be counterproductive for everyone. Better to just share info that is simple and friendly enough; my favorite is this video: Kurzgesagt: The Side Effects of Vaccines - How High is the Risk?

This is what I hate most about the privacy community, too fanatical and purist to allow extremely useful optional features that would allow them to reach more people.

You’re not talking about ukraine or denmark, you brought up an unrelated topic in response to something another user said. What about your consistency?
Nah, you’re just a troll.

*Sigh. Okay, I’ll take the bait and throw it harder.

Can the rest of you trolls and idiots respond here with some bullshit so I’ll block you? Thanks for helping me clean up.

Nothing, and that’s fine. I don’t know if it’s because of fanaticism with the topic or what, but it seems strange to me that people get upset about this.

But to try to clarify it better, the other user says that self-determination is one of the values of europe (to fight for), hence my comment.

There are some nations in europe that attempt self-determination, without any recognition. For example catalonia had close to 50% support, but europe looked the other way; even after trying to organize a referendum on their own, being repressed with excessive violence and ending up with political prisoners, europe looked the other way.

right to self determination

Some stateless nations in europe have something to say.

Fair point, unfortunately I doubt it is easy to find international news prior to his notoriety.

This is already reliable news, but I guess it will be popularly dismissed anyway. I find it worrying that corruption cases (with solid evidence) are dismissed by easily using russia as a scapegoat.

I think people underestimate the difficulty of forging a convincing case, and overestimate russian agents.

But the files obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and published on Sunday claimed that Zelenskyy and his partners established a network of offshore companies back in 2012.

The report also found that Zelenskyy, just before he was elected, transferred his stake in one of the offshore companies to his top aide Serhiy Shefir – the target of a shooting attack last month.