This is clearly nonsense, some people don’t shower every day.

Remember when people used to go insane in newsgroups screaming bloat if a program update was 80 KB bigger than the previous version and now people do not notice an extra 4 GB.

Also a lot of politicians can lick their own eyes.

Same capitalist market where billionaires receive massive socialistic handouts, bailouts and tax negations from governments.

Study finds water is wet.

I meant no suggestion of a negative aspect towards floozihood, I have drunk cider with many such in my life I only noted my comprehension of their intention of attention.

If he is 78 and using AI to generate responses he is not declining in any significant way, the thing you may need to accept is not his decline but his withdrawal from you.

I think any satisfaction derived from either is simply from a feeling of good maintenance and is unremarkable and the fact you have indeed remarked upon it suggests you only wish to draw attention to your anatomy like a floozy.

The more general thing is that all love relationships are unrequited to a degree. The unrequitedness is on a sliding scale from examples conventionally described as unrequited to anything where there is an asymmetry in the love which is most cases. Usually one partner will love the other more and I think this is by evolved design, it means that in significant disagreements the one that loves more will back down as they fear the loss of the relationship more. Unevenness of the shared love will allow the bond to maintain itself when more equally bonded partnerships would have broken.

It is not very complex, both are generalist reference terms, shit can be a neutral referrer or have negative connotations and dope can be neutral or have positive connotations. So your two phrases decant to this referred to thing is a good thing and this referred to thing is a bad thing.

It’s an enigma why they chose it in the first instance.

So then something else will be found that yields a degree of anonymity, that is the game we all play. They sell us security which tastes like totalitarianism and we respond with compliance which smells like subversion.

The inverse correlation with income is unsurprising because in many countries public healthcare has a cost in money or time at the point of use. The statistics likely indicate an avoidance of this cost rather than any intellectual preference for AI diagnosis.

I wonder if some of those critics are by an odd coincidence funded by phone related entities.

The US placed troops in Germany for its own influence not to aid Germany but that is joined up thinking. Let’s destroy all our bases that will show them.

A quivering glistening mass.

They are as good as their Word™

Official cutting off your nose to spite your face policy.

You are catching it now too, but such is the way of it. People do not want levelled counter views and debate they want to scream bloody villainy and evil doings and then disappear into the crowd when everything turns out fine. And do it all in the name of free speech, as long as its only their speech of course.

You mention Windows Me and Vista as low points but Windows 8 was such a donkey that your memory must have blocked it so you could go on with your life. And you just know this wonderful new streamlined and privacy conscious version is going to look suspiciously like Windows 7 which most users wanted to stick with anyway.