• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • There are things you can manage, but they tend to be about controlling your environment.

    JD Vance is the perfect example of someone that benefited from the military. Fit in (and let’s be honest being a straight white male still helps). Find a job that involves sitting behind a desk. Get some experience pulling a 9-5 for a few years, and then go to university for free. Don’t get injured. Don’t get PTSD.

    All of this attitude with a capital A is too late. You can’t Attitude yourself out of a missing leg, and you can’t Attitude yourself out of PTSD. You can learn to cope better but coping well with PTSD is still worse than not having it.

    Either have a plan to avoid danger or you need to be lucky.


  • I mean the fundamental problem is that humans are dicks and moderation is always needed. It should also be paid, and supported with counciling and recovery time when needed. Dealing with toxic content is a job.

    Federation isn’t very good at this. The tech is great but everyone is a volunteer and there’s (afaik) no global ban hammer so trolls move from one instance to another. Bluesky currently has venture capital to pay for moderation teams, and centralized ban options.

    I don’t know how long this can last without advertising revenue though.



  • Because it all connects together, and you can program them jointly to help solve tasks.

    Having email and version control inside emacs makes it easy to set up an email based patch system.

    Of course this system will then benefit from the existing code highlighting, introspection, and an integrated debugger.

    Integrating it with your time planner means you can automatically add commits to your journal as a way of tracking what you’ve been working on.

    The old joke always was emacs is a great operating system, it just needs a good text editor.

    The real downside for me is everything is just a little bit janky. It all almost works perfectly and the code is right there to fix it, if you can be bothered. Generally I can’t.



  • It’s about generative AI as it is currently used.

    But yeah, the complaints everyone has about Gen AI are mostly driven by speculative venture capital. The only advantage Google and openai can maintain over open source models is a willingness to spend more per token than a hobbyist. So they’re pumping cash in to subsidize their LLMs and it carries with it a stupidly high environmental cost.

    There’s no possible end game here. Unlike the normal tech monopolies, you can’t put hobbiest models out of business, by subsidizing your own products. But the market is irrational and expects a general AI, and is encouraging this behavior.








  • Both. It’s satire.

    The “benefit” of world hunger is that it keeps people locked in their place and entrenches the status quo. This is actually true, and the author believes it, but he doesn’t like it.

    Many people benefit from world hunger though, and every time you hear that poverty is a hard problem to solve you should ask yourself, how much of that is actual problems and how much is the status quo resisting change?