Are you trying to imply doubling the available workforce is not good? Its usually a good thing.

Women not being forced to do the reproductive labour in the family? Good.

Families being coerced into having two incomes to make ends meet, meaning they don’t get as much time with their children as they like? Bad.

Hey! I happen to be more productive afterwards when I spend 6 hours perfecting my neovim config at work, thank you very much!

That channel kinda seems like part of the anti “woke” bandwagon outrage tourist.

All that shit is happening in Germany, too.

ratio

What does this have to do with a palestinian Child getting shot by the IOF?

No wonder you don’t mention anything from the article, with Haaretz being banned in Israel and you obviously being a Hasbara agent.

RA3 brought us Soviet Russian Tim Curry. Nothing has to be redeemed, fight me.

Say whuuut? 👀

I only read it somewhere since I only played the game on PC way back.

Supposedly, the PS2 version suffers from slowdown/FPS dips.

The PS2 version of Grandia 2 is the worst one, if I remeber correctly. Better emulate Dreamcast for that one.

Do you want to readegermansmemessfrom ich_iel? Cause that’s how you get german memes from ich_iel.

Has he shown change, though? Why would you just assume stuff like that?

No, propaganda is when Putin pays trolls to disagree with me online.

Kaufland is open to marketplace skalpers.

While I don’t have a perfect plan on democratic governance (sorry, I’m just a small, little boi), these examples came to mind right away:

• Democratic confederalism
• Soviet Republic

What I also want to adress is that the things you’re criticizing in your first comment are structural problems of a liberal democracy. That means that they don’t stem from bad actors inside the system, but rather from the way the system is set up. Members of parliament have a free mandate and are under no direct obligation to enact policies on which they ran in elections. Yes, they can not get elected the next term, but this can also be an incentive to “get away with it” by e.g. manipulating the media landscape, lying, covering your tracks, searching for excuses, etc.

Also: you canwt vote the system away. When you’re voting, the only available opitions are ones that stabilize the parliamentary system. That’s why I don’t (or at least not completely) agree with “it needs both”. A general strike could lead to a more democratic system, while electoralism will always try to strengthen the current system.

Discussing why not having voting invites other methods of deciding power struggles that are even less democratic, does not mean a false dichotomy

Yes it is. It presupposes that parliamentary democracy is the only way of democratic governance.

You are literally demonstrating the effect of the media landscape that you’re criticizing: you’re acting like there’s no other democratic alternative than a parliamentary democracy.

Voting is a good system. The alternative is “let’s just have a fight with guns, or with money, or connections to powerful people, every time there’s a disagreement.”

Show me how this is not a dichotomy. Why are these the only options?

That just opens you up to false balancing. See: the media landscape on climate change for the last 70 years.

I think you’re opening up a false dichotomy here: it’s not about voting vs. the law of the fist. It’s about how the democratic systems are set up to keep the powerful in power.

The system is set up to promote those “absolutely craven, useless, and corrupt class of full-time political operatives who generally don’t give a shit about the people”. And “fixing” the media to not promote those things is like trying to teach a cat not to hunt mice.

There are more ways to have a democratic stucture of politics than “we decide onsour ruler every four years”.