• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 15th, 2024

help-circle




  • Rob@lemdro.idtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I do agree, that removing it would improve user privacy, however I feel that should be up to the user to decide on their own if they want or don’t want third party tracking cookies as it has been.

    The alternative that Google proposed I don’t think it’s any better then what is was before with 3rd party tracking cookies. I’d say it’s worse since it introduces new problems while keeping old problems under a new name.

    If everything goes through Google, no one has personal control and that’s what i’m against. This encourages what open source users should be against.



  • Rob@lemdro.idtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Why would an open source browser remove a feature just because a corperation did it. Talking like that, might as well use Chrome. Oh wait. But it’s *spyware / anti AdBlock.

    Why doesn’t Firefox make *using AdBlock harder since Google does the same? Firefox isn’t competing for Market share, it’s suppose to be an Opensource browser and being so should mean that you have the best features for the user, and not a company.

    Had you ever asked why would Google get rid of 3rd party cookies, and also ask, what did they replace 3rd party cookies with? another way for them to track you, and only them. They took potential revenue from sites that aren’t them just because they can.