• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 3rd, 2024

help-circle






  • Sorry but you don’t understand how this works.

    It doesn’t make sense when you say:

    they can use the money and resources for something else.

    For example. The US arms industry exports were worth 238 Billion $ in 2023. That means that the arms industry brought 238 billion from outside the US to inside the economy

    Because the money is coming from outside. If the industry stops, the US will lose this money.

    You are putting your convictions above logic. It doesn’t matter how hard you believe in something, if it is not practical it won’t work.

    If your suggestions really make sense you should be able to convince at least a few people. But look at the responses you’re getting. How can you convince all the world leaders to change if you can’t convince a few people in the comments?

    At some point you have to consider that you might be in the wrong. Admitting your mistakes makes you a better person and allows you to grow in character. I kindly ask you to consider that.

    My guy, I’m going to finish this conversation here. I hope this was useful. Cheers!


  • Brother, I respect your principles but you’re not understanding the issue with having no military.

    First you would have to convince all countries in the world to cut all military budgets. Including convincing countries that would suffer economically from the extinction of the arms industry.

    And once all countries have 0 military, there is an incentive for aggressive leaders to produce weapons since it would be easy to win a war against an unarmed country

    Disarming a country is an impossible mission because it only works if the entire world agrees to it, and because it makes everyone vulnerable once someone decides to break the agreement.

    I hope you can see it clearly now. Unless you have a proposal that fixes the two points above, your 0 military plan would not work

    I’m happy to discuss more if you’d like


  • Unfortunately a strong military is necessary to maintain peace

    It might sound contradictory at first but you should consider that people will always disagree. And if you and your neighboring country disagree and they have 20x more military power than you, they might be inclined to use force to solve your differences

    The only thing that allows you to have a civil and diplomatic discussion is the assurance that war is the worst of the options. As we see today, strong military nations are not afraid to abuse weaker military powers.

    I understand the hate towards the production of weapons, and I’m with you. But defunding the military is a simplistic, utopian argument that unfortunately would not work in the present time






  • It’s just a media game

    Every time Russia says “there will be consequences” they’re just throwing threats around like a dog barking from the other side of a fence

    All their cards are on the table. The only things they could pull off are drafting more people or going nuclear

    They’re now scrambling to find soldiers from other nations because announcing another draft would obviously shake Putin’s control over Russia

    I just wish Europe would stop playing this war like a political game. SEIZE RUSSIAN MONEY! What are you afraid of? Ruining relations with Russia? Fuck off! Ukraine won’t have people to fight forever





  • I understand that you’re angry. Sure the initial comment was slightly snarky, and yes, a lot of frustration is caused by a large lack of willingness to address men’s issues.

    But I’d just like you to find out what you want to achieve with your commentary.

    If your objective was to raise an argument and change someone’s mind, then starting a conversation with

    Stop pretending you know jack shit

    And

    STFU about your cope bullshit Will never convince anyone

    If you just wanted to express your anger, then I think it’s unjustified to direct it so intensely to the initial comment. The intensity does not match the casual tone of the comment and it’s uncalled for.

    Maybe you just wanted to spend some idle time by commenting on posts. Sure that’s fair, but considering the stress you put into this I’d say that’s probably a net loss for your mood

    That’s not what’s happening here

    Sorry if I misunderstood that. But your tone did not help with my understanding of your point

    The problem is that they brought up men’s rights issues in the most passive aggressive snarky way

    Sure I agree that the initial comment deserves some correction, but You will never get your point across by insulting someone. often to convince someone you should talk to them like they’re your friend. I know the insults might come more naturally than friendship, but respect is what effectively causes change.

    I’m just suggesting you use your energy and patience more efficiently

    I enjoyed this conversation, and hope you did too. Cheers


  • Hey, what’s up with the tone my guy? Message me if you need to talk fr

    Regarding the subject at hand,

    Evidently women still have many issues coming from male dominant culture formed before the industrial revolution, there has been good progress but there’s still a long path ahead.

    Men have issues coming from cultural norms too. imo the biggest hindrance for men at the moment is not nearly enough people talk about men’s mental health.

    MOST IMPORTANT NOTE IS:

    Promoting solutions for women doesn’t mean ignoring men’s issues.

    Promoting awareness to men’s issues is not against women’s interests.

    When someone is promoting progress, let’s not jump to “there are bigger problems elsewhere”

    If you want to promote change via debate, being aggressive is the worst strategy. Why not say “hey, I hear your argument for women, and on this note I’d also like to raise this other related subject about men’s issues.”

    That’s a win win conversation