I would never reveal myself because have you met people? I would absolutely be tortured for fun lmao

Haha train go up

Hmm, yes, very wise.

This is an interesting idea. A terrible implementation, but that’s just because 50-100 feral bots can outperform a human on most any digital metric.Things humans can do that bots can’t tend to be really thinky, and so don’t make good, easy checks.

I, personally, believe we’ll be shoved off the greater Internet by bots and malicious automation one day. There’s no solution that isn’t “fight and lose” But yeah, interesting idea!

Oh, I think I’ve been civil, too. Here, watch me over-generalize: you mean the same vets that recommend(ed) declawing cats? lol okay

What a bizzare take. Stop saying that. Are you just here to sling insults and boss people around, too?

ha, gotem

Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)

In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.

“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”

Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.

What a “damn kids these days” quote

Yeah, well. World is full of racists. Can hardly even make fun of 'em without being mistaken for one, now.

This reminded me of the month ‘wigga’ was every fucking one’s favorite word at my very-nearly-all-white school. Nothing good, indeed.

Ah, heck. I thought it was a witch’s curse. You’re telling me time fried this rice?

Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.

Now THIS is podracing

Wow, I can’t believe doom is so young! It’s been a cultural juggernaut my entire life, so it’s weird to think of Doom as “releasing.”

b e a n s tbh

IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”

Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?

Burdle der warter?? Uh hardly evun knew the wurtur!

“Hey everyone, 198-fucking-4 here. Unlike some other people, I don’t feel the need to tell others about myself. No, my opinions are my own and I’m keeping them to myself. The fewer people read this, in fact, the better!”

money based and profit-seeking pilled

adcore