• 3 Posts
  • 722 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • Yeah, and it’s not that I think Fallout is bad, it’s just…I think it feels too cartoonish? Like, people are supposed to be struggling, but despite the post-apocalyptic setting, each faction has their own little kingdom and seems to be doing alright. Medicine and stim packs abound, and nobody is really living on the knife’s edge.

    And while that’s at least partly by design (supposed to be satirical sometimes), it doesn’t feel completely satirical, like Saints Row, or completely serious, like the Metro series. It’s caught somewhere in the middle, and I think that’s what doesn’t appeal to me; I want it to be silly or not silly, and it rides that line in a way I don’t like.



  • FOSS is kind of an interesting case, because it sometimes operates with donations or grants just to improve development times and outcomes.

    Anyway, the sentiment is still something to consider, even in the world of FOSS. It’s less likely, mostly because people do it as hobby or communal projects, but that kind of trust can be abused. However, the original sentiment was intended more for endeavors where it costs money to maintain and operate a service, not anticapitalist software projects.




  • Telorand@reddthat.comtoTechnology@lemmy.worldruh roh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would want to see some data on costs, because I think you might be overselling the difficulty and cost a bit (I don’t actually know, just my good faith belief). Imagine if every content creator ran their own instance. Instead of needing to worry about every user coming to a single group of servers, the Creator only needs to worry about the cost of hosting their own content and the traffic they get.

    With the number of YouTubers who have to get sponsorships and Patreon anyway, it doesn’t really seem that infeasible or unreasonable to expect content creators to run their own thing or pay to have someone else to do it. Doesn’t seem like the YouTube money is that lucrative, anymore, so not like it would be all that different, either.








  • Maybe I’m misunderstanding what you wrote, but that’s not how sanctions work. It’s the people within their own country who are hurt by their country’s sanctions, not sanctions from other countries. This leads to domestic companies buying less exports, which is supposed to lead to more domestic production (or hurt the other country’s economy), but regular people aren’t typically buying exports direct from the producers. That’s not a problem Bitcoin can solve, unless import companies start using it or regular people start importing themselves.

    However, it’s still the wealthy who most benefit from crypto. It’s the wealthy who make the barrier to entry higher, and it’s the wealthy who can very easily manipulate the value of this value-less currency (just look what they can do with the stock market, and that’s regulated).

    It’s not that I’m against the plight of the downtrodden, I just don’t see how crypto actually helps them; like I said, it’s another “American Dream,” a promise of wealth that will never materialize for most, because the wealthy have rigged the system.