• 0 Posts
  • 735 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle





  • Under capitalism, profit maximization is necessary for the company you own to survive. You cannot be a “nice capitalist”, at least not for long. A person that is nice will have to conform their behavior to maximize profits anyways.

    This dynamic does not exist in other systems, where your class membership makes you a relentless recursive tool of the market.



  • That’s describing capitalism, where profit maximization is systemically required for one to fulfill their role at “the top” and monopoly is the best way to increase profits.

    Historically, “greed” was not the main characteristic of the ruling class. They did not exist under capitalism. Money itself often meant little. Land, a military, prestige, yes. But money fir money’s sake was officially frowned upon and generally left to the clergy to handle the hypocrisy.


  • TheOubliette@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlThe culprit of all wars
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    No, feudalism has different economic relations than capitalism. It is about farm product graft from land-bound peasants on penalty of death or injury. Capitalism is about wage working. Capitalism emerged in the context of feudalism, so there were periods where both existed side by side, but capitalism is clearly different.


  • Nazis executing civilians is bad. Partisans executing civilians is bad. A bad action is bad no matter the intention. Insert some quote about how the history is filled with good intentions.

    Again, this is not a serious geopolitical thought.

    Tell the ‘unlawful’ killed that it’s ok, it was a growing power who haven’t attacked someone for a long time and just tries to lift your country out of poverty that bombed you to bits not the cashking warmongerer, and see if they agree with your reasoning.

    Respond to my reasoning in any way whatsoever.


  • TheOubliette@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlThe culprit of all wars
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Do you think the USSR and Eastern Europe were free from the tendencies of capitalism to create imperialist war? The only post-WWII wars in Eastern Europe were skirmishes by capitalist-funded nationalists (quasi-fascists) and the civil war in Yugoslavia exacerbated by NATO to balkanize the country. The wars that the USSR supported were all pre-existing national liberation movements against imperialist colonizers, and they nearly always entered after imperialists had thrown massive resources into oppression. For example, Vietnam.




  • TheOubliette@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlThe culprit of all wars
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    I thought it would be implied that I’m speaking about modern times. The economic system is the msin driver in large societies, though. In Europe, prior to capitalism, the primary determinant was feudal interests.

    Chimps don’t have war. They fight, but is every skirmish a war? Wars come from creating and wielding armies.


  • TheOubliette@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlThe culprit of all wars
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Capitalism is the primary driver of wars, it determines the basic structure of what is and is not permissible, generates nation-states (these did not always exist, actually), and then creates the conditions by which the national bourgeoisie nation-states push for war in order to become international bourgeoisie (imperialists).

    For example, the US keeps the middle east in a regular state of war to prevent them from having independent policies regarding oil. It is concerned about oil because of the petrodollar. It is concerned about the petrodollar because it is th3 primary financial war instrument by which it jeeps other countries sending superprofits its way and otherwise screwing with countries using interest rates. And it does those things because the US is the global seat of capital, it is where the big finance companies are based.

    How many wars have there been in the middle east since 2000? How has the US been involved? Do they just do it for the thrill of domination?



  • The US invaded Cuba to try and stop its revolution following brinksmanship with the USSR on nukes. If the US today understood Mexico to be a military proxy it would be talking about nuking CDMX. The country is run by incredibly cold and violent people. It would run 24/7 propaganda about the necessity of invading Mexico for our defense and to make preemptive strikes. It would create false flags to justify whatever action they wanted to take. These all have precedent for going and destroying countries thousands of miles away.

    Re: what you think you would do, the US has been doing a genocide for over a year. What have you done to ensure it does not happen again? Did you vote for Harria of the Biden-Harris administration carrying it out? If so, that is the exact opposite if what you said you would do.

    Remember, no one is immune to propaganda. Wr must always challenge ourselves and be reqdy to receive and process criticism.


  • Regarding Ukraine, there could be nothing further than truth https://youtu.be/7gxssycoxz0

    Yeah I’m not watching a 35 minute video with no context or explanation. I also didn’t say anything about NATO expansion, the apparent topic of the video.

    Perhaps you could describe what you think it wrong about what I have said.

    As for Israel the problem is more that it isn’t a lapdog, it looks like US is Israel’s lapdog.

    Israel knows its value to US interests and leverages this to its advantage, but never confuse this for Israel being the lapdog. They are dependent on US “aid”, weapons, investment, and diplomatic cover. Do you really think that tiny country is dominant over the global superpower?

    Also, be careful when making this claim, as it is often made in antisemitic circles.

    As it looks like Israel does whatever it wants even if it is against US interests, and US still supports it.

    This is because it is otherwise fully aligned with the interests of the US ruling class. It serves a useful purpose. This is also because US propaganda would have you believe that it never tolerates, say, the killing of Americans. Of course it does, it just uses this as an excuse when it wants to do something terrible to another country.