So it does violate some core rules of both FS an OS. Also the text is so full of legal holes which makes it useless in it’s goal too. It only prevents good-intent individuals from contributing and acts as a tool in hand of big evil corpurates.
No. It’s not. It’s just a proprietary source-available software. The license is neither Free nor Open.
Only if it was Free Software or at least OpenSource…
The Princess Bride
Nextcloud calendar
By Democratic Confederalism
There can be no communist government. Communism is a collaboration of communities, not a single government. Just as like as Lemmy itself.
Can a cow be a Mr? 🤔
I don’t. I chatGPT these days
Legally phone box is the proof of buying. Court can decide you stole the phone if you don’thave the box.
Software Freedom #0: The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose
Open source criteria #6: The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.
By forbidding some entities from using the software, it violates both Free Software and Open Source and makes itself proprietary.