It would just sit there and be dormant.
It would just sit there and be dormant.
It doesn’t remove them, it uninstalls the app from the current user profile, but they persist on system level. That’s what I meant with the comment in brackets.
It’s the best you can do if rooting is not an option, but I prefer a full removal.
Plenty of reasons.
And a bunch of other stuff I need in order to have a fully functioning device.
SEO is spamming a link to your stupid blog all over Lemmy, apparently.
He was also doing a PhD at the same time, and writing a dissertation is not exactly a small feat.
Yep it’s still a beta, that will be coming soon.
Lemmy Ultra = Sync Ultra
Lemmy Adfree = Sync Pro
The old app was simply too cheap, that’s that. One-off purchases for $2 are hardly sustainable for individual developers.
Adfree is 20 bucks, how is that insane?
That’s for ultra. Simple adfree is 20 for a lifetime.
Exactly. And lifetime is just about 100 bucks, who cares. Sure it sounds like more than the casual $2 you throw at a random app to remove ads, but considering that I used Sync daily for ~12 years, it’s really just peanuts in the long run.
I’ve bought a bunch of seemingly cheaper apps and then used them 10 times over 2 years and they ended up discontinued, that’s like 20 cents per use.
I’d have racked up tens of thousands with Sync that way. Easily the most used app on my phone.
If it’s open source, the developer can’t monetize it. Everyone will just be able to remove ads and compile it from scratch.
FOSS is all fine and dandy, unless being a developer for a popular service (or app) is your sole source of income.
The actual blockers were fixed in the first couple days, if not hours. We are now at beta 23 within just 10 days since the internal testing began, lj has been working like a madman.
Those poor trees.
Through investors, who consider the revenue a good indication for future profits. So they float the bill and receive shares in the company instead, and cash out during the IPO.
*billion
And profitability is not the same as generating revenue.
You can earn $200M a quarter and still have expenses of $220M, meaning you’re making a net loss.
That’s why companies focus on exponential growth first and don’t really care about portability, but once the userbase is large enough, they will try to monetize it. Either through ads, or paid subscriptions, premium plans, special avatars, etc.
That will surely piss of some of the early adopters, but usually isn’t significant enough to make an actual dent.
The last step (which we have also seen) is then kicking out staff. That has two effects:
1., It brings down the overhead (= salaries and attached taxes & social security) 2. The revenue per capita is inflated, i.e. it looks as if every employee is generating 4000 bucks instead of 2500 (random example), which is something that looks good in an IPO prospectus.
Also works using an account from another instance, thought it might have been cross-linking incompatibility, but nope.
Device information