

Its so wacky out there. When I read something like this I’m sure its The Onion. And its not. Then I read a headline about US politics and its totally believable , alas its The Onion.
A humble sailor


Its so wacky out there. When I read something like this I’m sure its The Onion. And its not. Then I read a headline about US politics and its totally believable , alas its The Onion.


While I find this fascinating, what these monopolies do with their power, I wonder more what the alternatives are… There where some interesting Economist articles on major changes to financial techs aiming to break this though that was years ago and I don’t remember much other then discussion of micro loans and government cryptos schemes


Non science guy. More interested in an original source of that picture: Harry Henderson smoking a cig.
Though, I wish I had at least a broad comprehension of the maths involved. Would be neat while watching the new age of rockets flying into the abyss.


This is a poor argument which will be repeated through out this thread because it doesn’t take into account the product… Meat consumption can not be ‘cleaned up’ or ‘held accountable’ unless you are growing or purchasing meat from a direct source. You can change your habit in that sense. But when you purchase a fast food meal or even a Sysco steak at a fine dinning establishment you are supporting the established CAFOs that make the statistics in the post. Not corporate greed.


Hence the bumper sticker that has been around since the 70s
REAL ENVIRONMENTALIST DONT EAT MEAT
Homesteaders and locally grown meat is a necessary way of life for those living in the country. CAFOs and suburban grillers can burn in hell.


Can the clickbates stop using “meltdown?” Do we really think these fucking snakes even more then snicker at this investigative reporting? what are these papers threshold for claiming a meltdown?
I like how I can’t even read this article with an ad blocker enabled.


Fuck AI. Fuck Trump. Fucking love Fransisco de Goya.


I hope this isn’t a real person.


I guarantee he is not charged with terrorism. And threatened in the news cycle or by Pam Bondi’s office with the death penalty. His victims deaths didn’t affect enough shareholders to warrant such rhetoric.


Media is essential in getting that distinction out to the laypeople, but they’ve largely failed.
They haven’t failed anything. Their billionaire owners purposely misconstrue the truth to manufacture the exact opposite intentions. Creating said “high support”
I believe he was trying to create some scale


Private? As in commercially owned by a company and not a public transport track? Or do Denmarks elite just build rails to boast?


How is that 15k statistic calculated? Sounds questionable. Do you have a source? Does that include social spending like the dedication of parents time and personal expenses such as in South Korea? Is that government spending? Are fundraisers only a USA thing?


Sorry NGnius already posted this but interested if you folks like exodus. Its pretty sweet.
I’m new to this but my app store uses exodus to rate privacy of apps. It rates this app at 6/10. You all trust or use exodus? Wouldnt use this app anyway as I agree it should be open sourced. Especially using camera to scan items.


Read the Oppenheimer book. Watch the Barbie Movie


I don’t know its name but he has a PSA on radio that would advise you NOT to smoke. He says it does not make you look cool.
Yea, so here’s the thing bud, those guys are there to protect the capital owners… Sorry. Pete’s right about their inclusion however not accepting if they fail to stand down then they should go too.
This is less indicative of the political leanings of the population and more the result of a precise planned and serious effort of the right and rich political machine to spread their message. This is why Trump won 2025 in such a big way.
Edit: but your statement is also true