The use of the word “more” in “more money more problems” indicates that both money and problems are continuous variables. Thus, the statement should be modeled with predicate logic, but with analysis. As phrased, the sentence implies a positive derivative between the two variables. If assumed to be valid over the complete range of possible values, “less money, less problems” indeed follows.
Reminds me of a Mandelbrot fractal
Which one of those is Jeff Daniels?
But please take a snapshot of the planet first
Wikisource has many: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Cookbooks
My best guess is that in some configurations it raises SIGSEGV and then dumps core. Then, you use a debugger to analyse the core dump. But then again you could also set a breakpoint, or if you absolutely want a core dump, use abort() and configure SIGABRT to produce a core dump.
Yep, and Matlab too I think
Too uniformly distributed
The recline is needed for overnight flights. On short haul, it’s unnecessary indeed. I think some airline have ordered seats without recline already.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
Only very short summaries of what happened, linked to Wikipedia article for more reading.
Did you say throw, loop, and sleep?
Oh mein Gott, ist das eine RTL-Samstag-Nacht-Referenz?!?
Apparently I can only make you mod if you comment in the community, so please make a post there with a comment in it, and I’ll add you Cheers
Episode “The Sentence” from The Outer Limits (1996)
I agree that there shouldn’t be official names for versions.
Literally Fahrenheit 451