Shout out to !iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org !

How cute that you believe that.

imagine someone comes over to your place and starts protesting and saying how bad you are

What, you want them to lie to you to your face?

This should like… just not be a rule though

Eh it’s issues with l.w mods being overall cowards.

Think of the lemmy.world mods!!!

It seems they don’t care.

Then get that in writing.

Or with cooperatives. Cooperatives are a good alternative to corporations.

Just sell the car to a derby demolition show. We all win.

Regarding things like dockers and flatpaks, I mostly “solve” it by only running official images, or at least images from the same dev as the program, where possible.

But also IMO there’s little to no reason to fear when using things like flatpaks. Most exploits one hears of nowadays are of the kind “your attacker needs to get a shell into your machine in the first place” or in some cases evn “your attacker needs to connect to an instance of a specific program you are running, with a specific config”, so if you apply any decent opsec that’s already a v high barrier of entry.

And speaking of Debian, that does bring to mind the one beef I have with their packaging system: that when installing a package it starts the related services by default, without even giving you time to configure them.

I don’t.

Yeah, hot take, but basically there’s no point to me having to keep track of all that stuff and excessively worry about the dangers of modernity and sacrifice the spare time I have on watching update counter go brrrr of all things, when there’s entire peoples and agencies in charge of it.

I just run unattended-upgrades (on Debian), pin container image tags to only the major version number where available, run rebuild of containers twice a week, and go enjoy the data and media I built the containers and installed for software for.

The screw-ups keep mounting like they want to be Google.

They (and we)'ve got to admit, the solution is not going to come from within their (managerial) ranks.

At this point I’d be happy to offer my services as a BDFL for Mozilla, at but a small fraction of the wages of any of their C-suites.

And this is not about the kink. It’s about the shitters in the video.

Heck, it probably can be done with a regex. (Yeah, I know)

There’s no need to kill three forests just to do the exact same work you could have done by opening your dataset in Excel.

Why? The hardware

Right there, you are so close!

Forgejo gives you a registry built-in.

Also is it just me or does the docker hub logo look like it’s giving us the middle finger?

I use Debian ftw.

Doesn’t need to (but yeah yeah they’re Google, I know…). They just should name it “Gulf of México” or whatever the translated name is to the user’s device, and add an asterisk somewhere that shows a note to the effect of “a small fraction of Confederate remnants think it should be called ‘Gulf of America’”.

What else do people expect them to do?

1.- Refuse-

2.- Apply only the part of the name change that’s actually covered by US jurisdiction. The Gulf of Mexico extends noticeably beyond US’s borders.

But hey this is Google we’re talking about.

Besides, it still say Gulf of Mexico if you’re outside the USA.

If I’m a eg.: Colombian, it should be “Gulf of Mexico” “Golfo de México” wherever I stand, not “Gulf of America”.

Internet posts are being loaded!

Oh dear!