Funniest are people quoting Goebbels who said something like that…

Like… Bruh… You are falling for the tricks of the minister of propaganda of the Deutsches Reich of 1940 in 2025…

A little bit more pressure and you create diamonds…

After the actual Nazis banned a party, people made it far more difficult to ban parties.

You can try it, but it could fail. And the whole spectacle means more attention for them.

The interview probably ends abruptly when he finds out, she’s homosexual.

Bloodborne

Well, unfortunately, we also have idiots here in Germany… There is probably a fan club. Mainly the right voters…

But no, I don’t think, that this changes who builds the next government in Germany.

It’s hard to ban political parties here.

Some people will try this, but our law could stop that…

Mmmmh… Antibiotic with taste of chicken… Yummy…

Why would Ukraine send them back there? If NK wants them back, it’d probably be expensive…

If you watch 43 videos per day on every day, yes…

Some of us go to work or school or whatever and can’t therefore do that every single day, especially not when the videos are longer…

YouTube has litterally attacked it by blacklisting all know cloud IPs world wide when tmaccessing YouTube.

Self-hosting is the only reliable way. Sometimes, YouTube breaks something, but after a few hours, Invidious pushes a fix…

But if you target the latest tag of all relevant images, itms just:

docker compose pull; docker compose down; docker compose up

I think, there is usually 1080p with 30fps and with 60fps. So, they are probably selling you 30 more frames per second… for $13…

13 per month. That’s over 100 per year. Did not expect it to be that expensive.

Friendly reminder: If you know how to use Docker, you can self host Invidious on your PC and have an experience better tgan YouTube for free.

Makes sure to waste as many tokens as possible…

Tell me, you really need unions without actually telling me…

If you think that going to jail because of “mercing” a CEO is the better solution…

That’s not a bad argument.

Keeps the question open whether this is also part of https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldwide-by-energy-source/

Come one… If it’s really about minimizing death, just build photovoltaik on the ground. But that’s not the priority of humanity anyways.

You kind of missed the point of my post. I don’t want to get rid of nuclear. I just don’t want to build new NPPs, when there is a far cheaper alternative.

BTW: How many people have died because of photovoltaic that is constructed on the ground on large fields? Probably 0… If you want to minimize death, this is the way to go.

If the premisse is to avoid possibly every death, photovoltaic on the ground, e.g. on fields (not on houses) would probably be the least deadly solution.