I distinctly remember the two Kevins as hosts around the time I watched G4TV. I ended up playing a game called Blockland for years after they showed it on air. Somehow I never realized Kevin Rose went on to become that Kevin Rose.

He did say he would fuck his daughter if she weren’t his daughter.

175 billion dollars to build a thing in just a few years that’s meant to protect America from attacks…

What attacks? Terrorists hijacking planes? Russians capturing the presidency? Right wing extremism? School shootings?

There’s nothing immediate. And some trumpy dome doesn’t sound like we’re future proofing anything but Lockheed Martin’s bank accounts.

Worse, it’s an image of Britain.

SO is a collaborative encyclopedia of technical discussion that tries to be relevant, be practical, and to not constantly repeat topics.

LLMs can’t provide that structure, they just shit out answers.

Most people think SO is a help desk and don’t appreciate the structure and just want it to shit out an answer.

Maybe SO isn’t dying so much as a cancerous growth is being treated.

He’s right. I went to highschool with 50 kids per class, where teachers played on their phones, or hid in their office, or just switched jobs requiring year round substitutes. I took remedial math because that was what had room, and when my teacher realized that he looked like he died inside a little bit.

He’s right… in that AI is better than some teachers. AI is a step up for some kids.

Some of the best dj sets I’ve heard have come from dudes that dress like this.

deleted by creator

“He’s telling us not to use it, and then he’s using it himself”

Just because the teacher might have screwed up doesn’t change that experts in a subject can assess LLM output, while a student who knows jack shit about the topic can’t. Just because the teacher messed up and let ai weirdness degrade the quality of education in the eyes of students, doesn’t mean just anyone can use chatgpt to generate college courses.

I read the original article but not the interview. I wonder how much communication there was about the work before the student decided they deserved a refund.

Israel has the means to discover and expose evidence. Israel has the need for positive PR. But Israel consistently does not provide satisfactory evidence for their actions. Best case, they only have “reasonable” suspicion from a military standpoint. At best they think they should be blowing up hospitals for reasons, but know people won’t accept the collection of evidence they have, and so this is what happens.

To rephrase for lemmings: Israel bad. Israel want evidence. Israel can get evidence. But Israel no provide evidence. Probably because there’s no evidence.

When I read through the American report, it detailed genocide by Israel. It painted a horrific picture with Israel holding up or “losing” food and medicine in order to starve civilians.

The report concluded with “There is no genocide.”

It’s what happens when there’s a genocide but you decide there isn’t one, but you still need to describe the genocide.

On YouTube I’m seeing

Steve ✓ (2 hrs ago): Can’t believe that happened. Has anyone tried Elons bullshit? (20k likes.)

(Then a bunch of replies praising Elons AI.)

Bob (5 hrs ago): Can’t believe that happened. (10 likes.)

(Reply pointing out a Bob had his comment copied by a bot)

Tweep Donkle

Full page ad

What is Tweep Donkle?

Ad

Tweep Donkle is a meme. But first–what is a meme?

full page ad

Please subscribe

Memes started far back in human history. But first–when did history begin?

ad

Maybe it’s really because chess is one of the traditional ways to escape oppression. There’s more than a few top players that have done so, and speak out about it.

Nice lintels.

I have the same memory, except the teacher would just pop his head out from the office and tell us to knock it off. Someone managed to draw a giant line of Axe spray across the electronics desk/counter things and made a massive fireball. Nobody really got in trouble in that class.

I think there’s a couple Japanese soldiers that have hidden for longer.

Does your comment make sense as a response to my comment?

I’m confused why the devs stuck their head in the jaws of a sue happy monster. I ask, “But what was the point? What did they plan to happen?”

And you tell me Nintendo shouldn’t own mechanics? Like… I know that. I am so used to people misunderstanding me, that I specifically go back and add a huge banner saying “I agree with you.” I can call Nintendo assholes, call copyright broken, paint the devs as good but naive, and I still get “listen here, Nintendo is bad. Copyright is broken.”

What the hell is wrong with you? Did I say Nintendo ought to be allowed to drive drunk? Or did I express confusion at why someone stepped in front of the speeding drunk? I’m fucking tired of “oh you defended him? What do you love him?” bullshit.

Sorry I didn’t just shake my magic 8 ball and generate a pithy comment like you (probably) did. Here, I’ll shake my ball and write what comes up.

Nintendo is fucking scum. I want a competitor to Pokemon. Copyright laws are broken. Lawyers! LAWYERS!!

I wonder what their plan was – step on the toes of the biggest franchise while operating in one of the many countries with broken copyright laws and then hope for the best while raking in early access money based on an idea that legally can’t exist? Was it being naive and hoping they could just make a fun and successful game and Pokemon would be a merciful god?