the hypothesis was decay, not invasion.

they could kill everyone in any society they decide to invade. this isn’t an indictment of anarchism.

all anarchists do is go to organizing meetings. I guarantee you can find one nearby.

there simply isn’t evidence of some causal mechanism by anarchist societies must decay. their hypothesis can’t be proven. I didn’t even know how it could be tested.

humanity was completely unstructured at the beginning

can you cite this?

exarcheia and anabaptist sects come directly to mind, but you’ve just excluded them for some reason. it seems like no-true Scotsman to me.

hierarchy

there are a lot of competing theories. personally, I have begun to favor non-prefigurative models of revolution, so you should probably consult others on what they think they will build after the revolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal%3AAnarchism?wprov=sfla1

power vacuums do not exist in fact. you’re telling a story based on a myth.

what makes you think a community would not keep the means to defend itself and it’s neighbors?

there is no such thing as a power vacuum. it’s just a story telling device.

anarchist society comparable to state

a what?!

another story

they are a story that people tell to explain the world. but they are not a phenomenon that can be empirically tested.

anarchism is a system without rulers. warlords are rulers. ipso facto.

You are not making any sense whatsoever

because youre not qualified to be in this discussion

it’s tautological

if you don’t know exarcheia and the Paris commune are separate societies, you’re not qualified to discuss the practicality of if anarchism

currently not a single anarchist society exists.

that’s a lie

power vacuums are a myth

communism is stateless. whatever you’re talking about isn’t communist. anarchy works through mutual aid.