The only advice I’ll take from you is your username.

Less convenient and you lose music discovery. Also not comparable.

With Spotify going lossless, I don’t see how Tidal’s sound quality can be “better”.

Unless if you’re referring to Spotify’s current sound quality—in which case you’re making a meaningless comparison.

Not lossless, so it’s not comparable.

You mean deezent?

Tidal ‘HiFi’ is NOT lossless

… nothing, because people on the internet complain about everything. Every time. I mean, this service isn’t even out yet, so there hasn’t even been a chance to evaluate their music discovery algorithm.

I understand and relate with the frustration regarding the whole “more streaming services, higher fees” thing that’s still continuing in the industry, though. I mean, $20 a month for just music?! There are competing services that offer lossless audio at a lower price. But yeah—streamflation sucks!

I think the parent commenter just wants to feel like they’re better than you.

It’s like a dam.

Well, not watching the video would mean not doing due diligence, which would be on-brand for him.

This has the energy of walking away from explosions in slow motion.

THANK YOU! This is why I joined Beehaw.

Never mind it being too expensive to have kids, it’s too expensive to exist. Population aging is just an obvious consequence of that.