redrum

No. From the Case of Savva Terentyev v. Russia (police) of the European Court of Human Rights:

76.  The Court further considers that the police, a law-enforcement public agency, can hardly be described as an unprotected minority or group that has a history of oppression or inequality, or that faces deep-rooted prejudices, hostility and discrimination, or that is vulnerable for some other reason, and thus may, in principle, need a heightened protection from attacks committed by insult, holding up to ridicule or slander

ACAB, for pigs and CEOs.

Also, other relevant quotes:

When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw.
— Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom (1994).

If the oppressor uses violence, the oppressed have no alternative but to respond violently. In our case it was simply a legitimate form of self-defense.
— Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom (1994).

We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.
— Elie Wiesel, Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech (1986)

Obviously, the Russian Army is who has the info about the Russian casualties, and the Ukrainian Army has the information about the Ukrainian casualties. And both are not credible sources.

I don’t say that the articles using their publicized numbers of the casualties of the other country should be banned. Only those articles, without context about the numbers or the war, have no journalistic value.

Same, since debian potato, and forced to use windows in my work.

Why is credible the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Their main interest is win a war, not to provide reliable information to the public.

I’m not the mod, but that article is only parroting the numbers of a facebook post:

Source: General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on Facebook

The information is being confirmed.

IOF propaganda to justify the mass murder of 492 people today in Lebanon.

Zx spectrum --> msx-dos --> ms-dos --dr-dos --> win95 --> Suse (before it was bought by novell) --> win98 --> debian

To pay for sex is a form of exploiting; the consent is not really free. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, and I think that the exploitation of sex workers is one of the worst.

But morale is very subjective, and sex work is a very complex matter, where a lot of people, most of them women, work in very dangerous conditions and in situations of extreme need.

Debian has a list of vendors who sell it in a media (USB, DVD…), some of them also sell other distros.

There is a IHDI (inequality-adjusted Human Development Index):

In !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world we use stahmaxffcqankienulh.supabase.co for the images, could it be whitelisted?

Edit: community typo corrected

I’ve just checked now (Pixel 7a, Catalonia) and it’s upgrading to 14