Do I add it in My filters?

Yes.

I wrote that myself, using Firefox on macOS, it might not work in other browsers (though it should generally work in firefox across platforms). It probably doesn’t work on mobile.

It’s not just about defending the Netherlands but all of NATO, which involves deploying Dutch planes to eastern Europe, close to Russian AA systems for example.

I can’t wait for all the new Perun, William Spaniel and CaspianReport videos in the coming weeks!

France and Germany are basically arguing over who should lead the project. Also the French want to make the plane carrier capable, which is a requirement no one else involved needs and wants to spend money on.

Of course there are French restaurants, wtf?

Should have gone with British … no one wants their food outside their country.

Arctic mountains

This one was in central Europe, though.

It removes short-videos from the main page and search results, as well as removing the link from the menu.

Add this to your uBlock:

!death to #shorts
youtube.com##:matches-path(/)a#thumbnail[href*="/shorts"]:upward(7)
youtube.com##:matches-path(/)a#endpoint[title*="Shorts"]
youtube.com##h2>span:has-text(Shorts):upward(7)

!uselessredcircle@lemy.lol

That kind of policing only works on countries that don’t have nuclear weapons, which is exactly what provides the incentive to develop them … for example if the current “police force” can’t really be trusted.

The point is, once a country has it’s own nuclear weapons, it’s basically “above the law”. That simply doesn’t work this way on a smaller scale. You privately own a main battle tank and still wouldn’t be above the law.

Much easier to remember in German -> Stalaktiten -> Titten = boobies -> boobies hang down.

Many governments have demonstrated that it’s possible to provide a reasonable amount of security while also having strict gun control, because the governments have the monopoly over the use of force on their territory. Basically, they can bring a bigger gun to keep the order.

That fundamentally doesn’t work in global politics because there is no higher authority that can enforce nuclear weapon control or guarantee the security of a country that doesn’t have them. So having having the “biggest gun” yourself is really the only ironclad security guarantee a sovereign country can have.

Nah, that would be giving up too much material.

Huh? What are you talking about?

I will always read the comment after it was written, which is in always the future relative to when it was written.

No … it doesn’t. Slowing the passage of time is not the same as going backwards in time.

Doubtful. It’s not compatible with the current laws of physics and would break causality. Also some of those potential future time travellers should have shown up by now.

Indeed. But sending a video back from the future would require backwards time travel and that one doesn’t exist.

Given that AI exist and time travel does not, that would be the logical conclusion, yes.

No, ads are still blocked.