• 12 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2025

help-circle








  • Oh yeah I definitely didn’t expect any automated AI detection system to be as accurate as a trained human, but I expect corporations to replace the trained humans in the long run to save money and increase rate of output at the great expense of the quality of the output. To get correct results, we’d need a platoon of Captain Disillusions, not just some Joe Schmoe or Robo Joe Schmoe.


  • Ugh… it could be because I’m a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didn’t even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.

    Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.


  • There may not be an evolutionary advantage. Humans have developed empathy to care for each other, so many of us tend to do what we can to ensure that those who may have inherited or developed disadvantageous traits can still live full and happy lives, which also means those genes may be passed on to future generations. Hairy ears, wisdom teeth, color blindness, cystic fibrosis, etc. all may be disadvantageous genetic traits, but this presents the ethical question of if we would rather help the individuals with these genes be happy and reproduce, or if we would rather tell these people that they are forbidden from passing on these genes to protect the next generation from the afflictions (by way of direct genocide, selective breeding of humans, or gene selection and embryo screening).