

Now, you can add capitalism to that list. IDK, maybe not come back to a monarchy? But, that’s for Americans to decide, or, at least that’s my opinion.


Now, you can add capitalism to that list. IDK, maybe not come back to a monarchy? But, that’s for Americans to decide, or, at least that’s my opinion.


I’m so sorry for your loss. At first, I misread “Thought” for “Tonight”, so, even reading it was kind of a rollercoaster =(. Remember him, remember the happy times together.


Most games, including the finals, are hosted in the USA. This just won’t happen.


Most games, including the finals, are hosted in the USA. This just won’t happen.


Feels like you are guessing and hoping a lot, while the event is just months ahead.


Yes, there was, but it wasn’t ruining everything.


It’s not about the attendees boycotting, since they are already with their heads in their asses, and rich enough to spent their money on this. It’s the hosts who can boycott the shit out of this corrupt event. But be careful, in 1968, in Mexico, the students threatened to boycott the Olympic Games and got massacred, which brought the Dirty War period of the government against dissident citizens. I can see this happening to America during this period of relentless imperial fall.


Okay, they deserve it, but no country should be nuked, never again.
I’m in the same boat. The way it’s been used until now feels like mindlessly malnourishing the planet and the society. The AI economic bubble burst will be brutal, though.


Mozilla is not a big company, put in context.
It is plagued with bots and moderator shills. I don’t know about their organic userbase.


“Little bit worse”, “countless”, “big beautiful bill”, are you an American? If so, it really shows the USA barely maintains a Department of Education. If not, jeez, MAGA hats are everywhere.


No, count them, by all means.


Even if it’s Trump, it’s still wrong.


If they celebrate an invasion to their country, they are not even Venezuelan, they are traitors in my book. They should stay in America, that suits them. If they went there to pursuit a better life, because fucking life sucks everywhere, they should still feel aggravated by these events.


I have many names for them, though, only one it’s the official name. Nevertheless, I call them by their nicknames, which are numerous.


Honestly, it is not working in Spanish. I know some contexts where this is used, but as a gendered language it is quite complicated. While “Elle” is used for “them” in limited contexts like very inclusive universities, it’s not quite expected except maybe in the lgbtq+ community.
Most nouns end with an “a” for the female gender, so the proposed solution is to exchange the “a” for an “e”, but there’s a good amount of not gendered nouns and there exist already lots of exceptions to general rules. “Student” and “person” are two good examples of very important words with problems. “Student” is “estudiante” is Spanish, which ends commonly with an “e”, so it’s not gendered, you can call someone “el estudiante” (male) or “la estudiante” (female), the proposed “le estudiante” (singular) and “les estudiantes” (plural) sound good enough to me. Now, “person” is “persona” in Spanish, and it sounds gendered because it ends with an “a”, nevertheless, it’s actually neutral for any gender, but it’s usually accompanied by the article “la” which is used for female nouns, so, it’s “la persona” regardless of the genre of the person in question. This is also pushed in authorities, which used to be titled as nouns like “presidente” which is “president” and arguably gender neutral, except it is used for males and important women, like the president of Mexico, demand to be called “presidenta”. Most authorities, though, are going for the “persona presidenta” form, regardless of gender, to refer to the people in charge.
So, yeah, it’s been rather unpractical in Spanish.


I don’t know the others but for me, it’s the constant bugging with their users. I’ve used Firefox since the beginning, and they have made bad choices before, but this is the last straw. I’m tired of circumventing these choices, sometimes doing so is not even that transparent as a “kill switch” and users had to find strings in a cryptic about::config page, for example.
More important, I don’t want so-called AI in my life. I couldn’t care less about it. I won’t use it unless it helps me to find some scientific conclusion that advances our culture, and I’m not talking something huge, I’m not saying it shouldn’t be used at all. However, any use of AI for cotidian achievable tasks is morally unacceptable for me, and I’d ask for everyone a space for reflection on whether it is something filling a necessity in their lives. So, I guess it’s a rupture for me with Mozilla. I can’t use their product because I find it fundamentally wrong to support the massive use of technologies that barely do any good to society, and none to the planet. It’s not about another little discrepancy on features and settings, it’s about not giving people like me the platform to shout “fuck it, I don’t want it, stop it now”.


The way I see it, they have a proposal to make to you as a user. This is Linux, fortunately. There are plenty of choices to make, so you can try i3 or Sway to make things go exactly your way.
I don’t know Americans, but we Mexicans will never go back to any kind of a monarchy. Good luck with Donald The First Paedo, I guess.