• 1 Post
  • 247 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • Not something so complex that it requires docker. Not something that requires you to install a separate database. Not something that depends on redis and other external services.

    This comment is a bit silly. Databases just make sense for many services, although many could just use sqlite which would be fine (and many do). Redis etc is usually optional and might increase performance in some cases.

    I wouldn’t be a fan of something requiring docker, but it’s often just the easiest way to deploy these types of services (and the easiest way to install it as a user).

    Anyway, I’ll echo that clear, up-to-date documentation is nice. I shouldn’t have to search through actual code or the bug/issues section to find current information (but I get this is very challenging). And I’d rather projects didn’t make Discord a source of documentation (especially not the primary one).

    I’ll add that having a NixOS module is a big plus for me, but I don’t expect the developers themselves to maintain this.


  • Beyond the other comments is your public IP on ipinfo.io etc something like 100.64.X.X or 10.X.X.X?

    If so, you’re behind a CG-NAT and raw wireguard will not work. I say this so you don’t waste time configuring something that will never work. Ignore the below if you have a real public IP.

    Some ISPs will allow you to get a real dynamic ipv4 address for free, or you can configure ipv6 but any clients that you connect will also need public ipv6 support.

    Otherwise, consider tailscale/headscale/netbird (SaaS or on a VPS) which have NAT traversal support.






  • It may since have been fixed, but the Android client didn’t handle IP changes well in my experience. From my understanding, it only checks DNS when it initially connects, and so if the public IP changes the connection just stops working. This might be fine if the public ip changes infrequently or if you frequently connect and disconnect rather than leave the client always on, but not so much otherwise.

    Tailscale (and headscale) handles this gracefully, and you also get the nice NAT traversal features so no need to worry about CGNATs which are becoming more common.






  • vividspecter@lemm.eetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldTell me why I shouldn't use btrfs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    No reason not to. Old reputations die hard, but it’s been many many years since I’ve had an issue.

    I like also that btrfs is a lot more flexible than ZFS which is pretty strict about the size and number of disks, whereas you can upgrade a btrfs array ad hoc.

    I’ll add to avoid RAID5/6 as that is still not considered safe, but you mentioned RAID1 which has no issues.