I would be more offended at someone burning a Dr Suess book.

Do you think justice systems should adopt a less stringent standard for criminal convictions, like a preponderance of evidence?

This is a little off, when you quote a book you put the name of the book you’re quoting. When you refer to a book, you, um, refer to the book?

I think the gist of these authors complaints is that a sort of “technology laundered plagiarism” is occurring.

I can’t wait until facebook is integrated with the fediverse.

Agreed. I’m actually really enjoying the filter right now. I mean, I want reddit to fall apart too, but I am more interested in lemmy succeeding, and they are different wants.

I believe that threads is currently limiting advertising while they draw users in (before the expected bait and switch after they’ve captured the audience).

See “enshittification”

https://doctorow.medium.com/tiktoks-enshittification-bb3f5df91979

Heres the reference about carbon capture, with all the graphs you need to support this fact, for arguing with people later.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5

Chatterjee, S., & Huang, K. W. (2020). Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nature communications, 11(1), 3287.