I agree. Grusch could have been misled and bought into lies/misinformation. But at the very least I think HE believes it or wouldn’t be putting his career in jeopardy by reporting to Inspector Generals and testifying to Congress.

The above poster makes it sound like he is likely to be lying about it, which I think is a weak character attack and not arguing in good faith.

Don’t forget, along with the oral and written testimony, Grusch supposedly provided enough evidence to the ICIG to warrant an “urgent and credible” threat.

Unlike pinky promising, there are serious criminal penalties for lying under oath. It’s perjury and counts as a felony and comes with up to 7 years in prison. Not to mention what it would do to your career, especially a career in the military/intelligence.

Thanks gpburdell01, I just spoke with an old SCCM admin colleague and he confirmed the same thing you said.

That makes this much less of a big deal.

The way I read this, it makes it sound like updates need to be imported manually this way forever, from this point on. Is that correct?

Does this cause a large risk of missing or delayed updates for corporate environments using WSUS, or am I misunderstanding something?

Sounds like price-fixing. Wouldn’t this violate anti-trust laws, at least in the US?