We’re also seeing a rapid increase in commercial vacancies with WFH. But there are big challenges and costs to turning commercial properties into residential.

I’ve heard a lot about the problems. Surely there’s some good ideas for a solution out there?

  • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    The thing that bothers me is the shortage is completely artificial. There are approximately 28 vacant homes in America for every unhoused person. I live next to a housing development with an ungodly number of 4 bed 2.5 bath McMansions, most of which have, as far as I can tell, sat empty for the last two years. Not for sale, not for rent, just parked as an investment.

    • BReel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      This 100%. There is no shortage of physical houses. There is a shortage of AFFORDABLE houses.

      I just went through the buying process. I don’t make any crazy money, but a totally fine amount, more then a lot of people (65k/year)

      That meant even with a sizable down payment that I was rather lucky to have, my MAX was 200k. That meant I could afford like… 1/10 of the places for sale where I live.

      • Morogwen@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        and we’re soon going to find out if Biden’s student loan forgiveness is going to be canned by fascist ideologues or if the midterms spooked them well enough to handle it correctly. If they decide to pull some shenanigans, there’s a real possibility that we’re staring down the barrel of a 3rd once in a lifetime economic crash from yet another bubble.

      • Melpomene@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, same. I considered buying but given the 3% increase in the interest rate we saw, I’m just going to keep renting and hoping that things come back down before I’m 100 years old.

        • BReel@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          The only reason I got away from renting, even with the interest, was that it was still gonna be $100 cheaper, except +1 bed +1 bath and I actually OWN it.

          Plus, with my loan the interest rate can’t go any higher, but can be refinanced if things go lower. So since I was basically break even on the current interest, I decided to take it.

          • Melpomene@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I sort of like the idea that I can just… leave… and not worry about having an expensive albatross hanging around my neck. And my rent is low for the area so I’m doing better for now renting. I’d like to own eventually, I guess, but I prefer not to spend more per month if I can avoid it.

            • BReel@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              My rent was gonna go up $300, so that made it pretty easy as well haha. (I woulda stayed renting too if it had been cheaper /month)

    • Lumberjacked@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I deal with a lot of small business owners and it’s amazing how many of them have second homes. These guys are well-off but not what you think of as ultra wealthy. I think housing has been such a high-return investment that both corporations and individuals have been buying up houses they don’t need.

      Most states in the US I believe have homestead exemptions for property tax on your primary residence. Maybe if they just jacked the prop tax way up on anyone or entity that owns more than one single family property that would make it a less enticing investment.

      • Talaraine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Honestly I’d scale it. There’s a lot of people who don’t sell their first home when they move into their second and it’s helping them financially to rent it out. I don’t want to go after these people…

        Raise the tax per every house you’re doing it with. Make it prohibitive at scale.

        • Lumberjacked@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s not a bad idea. Tax rate is X. First house is X. Second house is XY, third house is XY*Y, etc.

          Problem is property rates are usually city, county, state so you’re not going to see consistency between them.