• jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This just made me think, why haven’t those damn commie Europeans with their fancy metric system come up with a better system for measuring time yet?

          People like to talk a lot of shit about how subjective the definitions for an inch or a mile are, but I never hear complaints about how a second or an hour are antiquated and based on things that only make sense from an Earth-centric point of view.

          I just feel like someone be mad at Americans for still using hours (ugh, trivially decided on the amount of time it takes the Earth to rotate) and not something like the amount of time it takes for 1 kilogram of water to decay via natural radiation when under a vacuum.

          By the way, before downvoting, this post is heavy with /s in case it wasn’t obvious.

          Edit: I just looked up the formal definition of a second and it is “the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom”.

          • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s all so arbitrary is funny. People get so passionate, but then I’ll bring up,“Why aren’t we using Swatch Time?” Or, why don’t we have 13 months of exactly 28 days (With a bonus vacation day or two)?

            They’ll usually fall back on what people are used to or tradition or something that just supports staying on imperial measurements. To be clear, I don’t give a shit what measurement system is used. It’s not like it takes a big brain to figure out what is going on when you travel.

          • hglman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Measures weren’t standard before the french revolution, so picking something and getting buy-in was easy. Time keeping was well established, and the French moved to a metric calendar, and proposals for metric time were made, but all were eventually rejected.

              • hglman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It will happen because there is so much traction on metric, but it will be slow and both systems will be marked for a long time.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    God, I wish we used this here. It is such a better system than our system of potholes being measured in washing machines in some parts of the country.

    • ezmack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you’re too fancy to divide by 25.4 or multiply by .0397?

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me head has a dent the size of two small pollocks, or a couple elderly bonobo tits, if you like.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We do use it where necessary; in science, engineering and the military, for example. Some of our imperial units suck, but others, like pounds and feet and inches are superior because they are more intuitive. The reality is that it’s a non-issue for most people and because of that we will almost always have some version of a mixed system, as do most of the other Anglophone countries.

      • hemko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? How is feet and pounds more intuitive? To me metric is more intuitive and imperials are whole another language, because I only learnt metric in school and only remember very few things in imperial (such as some dimensions on specific parts of bicycles).

        Converting yards to inches in your head is near damn impossible, but you don’t even need to count to know 5.25km is 5250m or 525000cm

        • Schmoinsen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No the ‘da’ is universal for ‘×10’. In german for example it’s also Mikro and languages can translate their prefixes as they want, as long as 1 km means 1000 meters and 1 ng means 1×10^-9 grams it is right by the International System of Units.

    • Schmoinsen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where are you from if I may ask? As far as I’m aware they are are pretty common, I know only of India which does them differently and maybe US / Canada? Although I think the point and the comma are switched in some countries, so a thousand Euros would be 1.000,00€

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m from the US, but I’m not talking about thousands separators in the whole number. I guess a better word would be thousandths separators.

      • Kleysley@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he is referring to the seperators after the decimal point, eg. the comma in “0.000,000,1”. I have also never seen this. Although you rarely deal with such small numbers outside of math, where I’d usually write it in scientific notation or as a fraction (like 1/10,000,000).

    • Mercival@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My sibling in Satan, that’s the backbone of the metric system. Nobody said anything about units.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Gotcha, so we’re talking kilotons and microinches then?

        Or is it actually the units that make the metric system scary to Americans?

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Woodworkers use the “metric system” all the time it seems. “Thousandths of an inch” is a common unit.

          • Classy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, I hear them referred to as “mils”. Although for more casual usage it’s far more common to use 1/x^2 measurements like 1/8" or 13/64". Thankfully my job has only really needed up to the 32ndth.

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To further add to this, a unit would be something basic like litre, metre, or a gram. So 1000 litres is a kilolitre. 1000 metres is a kilometre. 1000 grams is a kilogram. You may be familiar with the computer byte. A kilobyte is 1000 bytes. A megabyte is 1000 of those. Everything is divisible by 10, and everything makes sense.

        Interestingly, even though a calorie isn’t a metric unit (the joule is), the energy to raise 1 millilitre of water by 1 degree Celsius is 1 calorie.

        Also, 1 gram of water is 1 millilitre. And if you measure that in size, that’s 1 cubic centimetre. So if you go buy a litre of water, you know it’ll be 1000 cubic centimetres, and it’ll weight 1kg.

      • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And kilo should have been K nit k, and all should have matching characters not k-m, M-μ, G-n, T-p, P-f, E-a.
        Only Z-z, Y-y, Q-q, R-r are nice.

        μ is probably the greatest sin as it isn’t present on way too many keyboard layouts.

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Joke’s on you; I’m an insomniac.

    And FWIW we use the metric system too. We just tend to mix it with US Customary, like how Canada and The UK does with Metric and Imperial. Except the UK uses more Metric than Imperial. Vice versa for the US. Food is sold using both. Science and computing are always in Metric. And a few other things too but it’s 4am and I’m too tired to think.

    Edit: I don’t even know how a CPU’s temperature translates to Fahrenheit, but for weather it makes perfect sense. I know that 100°F is hot for outside, and that 80°C is hot for a processor. But I couldn’t tell you what is what if you swapped the measurements.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what I meant but I appreciate the help, lol.

        I meant that I don’t know how to read my PC’s temps in Fahrenheit and don’t know how to read the weather in Celsius. I do understand that 80°C would kill me, just not by how much.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is wrong. Some identifiers should start with a lowercase letter (like kilo)

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct, except in Computing, there the Kilo, Mega, Giga …are in uppercase, to differentiate it from the decimal system as it is based on powers of 2. 1 km is 1000 meters but 1 Kb is 1024 bytes

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is no correct. You are talking about kibi, mebi and gibi. The corresponding identifiers are Ki, Mi and Gi, not K M and G. K would mean Kelvin, M is 10⁶, G is 10⁹

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re both right, and that’s the problem.

          And it only gets more complicated from there.

          In storage 1GB is 1000MB and 1MB is 1000KB and 1KB is 1000 bytes… This is almost exclusive to hard drives. The rest of the industry uses what is now known as KiB, MiB and GiB, or kebibytes, mebibytes, and gibibytes. 1GiB is 1024MiB, and 1MiB is 1024KiB, and 1KiB is 1024 bytes.

          If you’re not talking about disk storage, then 1MB is 1MiB (1MB can be either 1024KB or 1000KB depending on context). The terms GiB/MiB/KiB were created because of the confusion between 1024 and 1000 for each jump in size, it’s a relatively new term created to increase clarity between the various definitions, where MiB will always be the 1024 KiB version, and MB can be either; in this way, HDD manufacturers don’t need to change anything that they are doing, and the industry can have a pure term, free of the confusion created by the disk drive industry.

          To bake your brain even more, datacom uses 1000 instead of 1024 for increments, so 1Kbps is 1000bits/s and 1Mbps is 1000Kbits/s. So data transfer, link speeds and throughputs are generally going by the 10base numbering instead of the powers of 2.

          The whole thing is a mess, and everyone wants to be the “will acktually” person to correct people about MB vs MiB and none of it actually matters, it’s an entirely stupid situation created because the data storage jerks wanted to be able to put a slightly bigger number on their box to say how much capacity their drives had by just omitting the extra 24 bytes per KB, and extra 24 KB per MB, etc. So their product would look like it’s bigger than it is.

          Arguing about it is pointless.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is not the result of inflating the data, but the consequence of the base 2 (binary system). 2^2 =4 2^3 = 8 …16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024 (1Kb), 2048, 4096, 8192, …

            I know of the new designations, but they are in my opinion unnecessary. It is true that K is the abbreviation for Kelvin, but in computing, if you don’t use a liquid-cooled super game computer, it’s clear to anyone that Kb has nothing to do with temperature.

            • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              The power of 2 version 2^10 or 1024, is indeed a result of the binary system, and since that’s how computers work, that’s what everyone used, but by listing a 1 billion byte disk as “1GB” instead of its actual, measured quantity, which, in gibibytes, I billion bytes is actually 953.67 MiB, companies can artificially inflate the perceived size of a disk, instead of buying a 953 MB disk, you’re buying a 1GB disk and only getting 953 MiB as a result.

              It makes the disk look larger than it is on paper and almost every newcomer to technology has questioned this at some point, and been disappointed that the x GB disk is nontrivially smaller than they expected.

              It’s a technicality that is disengenious, and creates confusion. All the disk makers had to do was conform to the same number of bytes per kB, and kBs per MB… Etc, that literally everyone else was using, but they wanted to deceive people about it, I guess. Make their marketing look better than the competition… There’s a few disk makers out there that are more or less reversing the trend, but the damage is done. It’s why the MiB and GiB (etc) terms even exist.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And then there’re the Americans who point at the Metric system and scream “why not us”. Which is anyone who’s sane and not afraid of change.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s the deal; where metric use is necessary as in science, the military and engineering, we use it same as everyone else. As for the rest, most people really don’t care, so that’s why we’ll probably always have a mixed system. It’s just not a big issue for most people, sorry to say.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, I did 2 years of physics studies but I never heard about atto and exa. Though I did spend a lot of time to try to memorise the other ones.

    • Pitri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just wait until you hear about zetta (10^21) and yotta (10^24) and their inverses zepto (10^-21) and yocto (10^-24). :D

      Huh, neat! When fact-checking my statement, I just learned that there are even two more prefixes on each side of the scale: ronna (10^27), quenna (10^30), ronto (10^-27) and quecto (10^-30). They got added last year.