fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agoFCC slaps $300M fine on “largest illegal robocall operation” it’s ever seenarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down113
arrow-up1765arrow-down1external-linkFCC slaps $300M fine on “largest illegal robocall operation” it’s ever seenarstechnica.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·3 years agoSo, what tiny fraction of their profits does this fine represent?
minus-squareultimate_question@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·3 years agoYa I appreciate the gesture but if this truly is the “biggest” robocall racket I have to imagine a 300M fine is a dropping the bucket
minus-squarePissinSelfNdriveway@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 years agoNot Like they will pay it anyway.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 years agoNot like they’ll seriously be expected to.
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 years agoProbably like 1%, maybe 2%
minus-squareubermeisters@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·3 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squareRob T Firefly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoThat information does not appear in the article.
So, what tiny fraction of their profits does this fine represent?
Ya I appreciate the gesture but if this truly is the “biggest” robocall racket I have to imagine a 300M fine is a dropping the bucket
Not Like they will pay it anyway.
Not like they’ll seriously be expected to.
Probably like 1%, maybe 2%
deleted by creator
That information does not appear in the article.