Pretty damning review.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    tl;dr with commentary:

    On testing errors: Yep, we’re trying to be better. [i.e. Let’s move on and forget this ever happened.]

    On the Billet auction: We’re trying to do the right thing after a miscommunication. [This one’s probably the best response, but that’s not a high bar.]

    On the Billet hit piece: We were only assholes to them to get them to be better. [MAJOR abuser vibes. “I wouldn’t have beat you if you didn’t deserve it”.]

    On releasing knowingly inaccurate videos: This is actually a good thing because we show our mistakes with footnotes. [WTF]

    On conflicts of interest from corporate partnerships: Crickets [No surprise]

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The worst part about the billet testing I feel is the arrogance when he said “it wouldn’t matter if it dropped temperatures by 20 degrees, it’s a bad product”

      Like a bad product to who? If I were overclocking and something knocked off a full 20 degrees, that’s a great product regardless of price

      There’s a reason people bought 4090s, some people want the highest tier performance and dropping an extra thousand to get something decent isn’t a concern for some

      • Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, he meant 20 degrees from where it was during testing, not from stock or competitors. Even in this hypothetical it would match other options at best despite a higher price. But the problem is that we can’t know this because they didn’t test it properly