• tkc@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fair points, but it’s also completely insecure, which is hugely important to a lot of people.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That “lot of people” probably represent less than 1% of the population. “Normal” people don’t use alternatives to SMS because they’re more secure, they used them because otherwise they wouldn’t be able to communicate with their friends.

      You’re on a platform where the privacy and open source crowd has a big stronghold, normies don’t give a crap about that.

      Heck, I’m very tech literate and the only reason I’ve got an alternative installed on my phone is because I’ve got two friends with whom it’s become a meme that we use anything but SMS, everything else I do via SMS/MMS/RCS.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely! Like I said, other protocols have their own beneft, and that’s a huge one. It’s why SMS for me is limited to really bland stuff when I can’t get data signal in a store. Even that, I tend to keep my phone off in stores, but when you’re doing “emergency” shopping for someone else, you kinda have to give up a little personal preference