It feels like a good year for a revolution, but I’ve got to remember Democrats are just Republicans with blue ties.
They don’t have actual principles like “not racist” or “against genocide,” they just have blue ties, even though it can be hard not to forget that.
The Nazis threatening to take over are the ones that want to take oil slower, wipe out Gaza slower, etc.
There’s no non-Nazi group trying to take over that tries not to abuse oil, refuses to recognize “Israel,” etc.
Helping the slow-pace Nazis beat the fast-pace Nazis is a vital step towards a better future and an obvious next step. It’s going to happen and you should help. Slow-pace Nazism buys us time.
But the gene pool has decayed too far into Nazism to stop there. The real solution doesn’t look like it will come with populist democracy. It looks like instead, new tech like robots can be used to overpower democracies, and the question is whether non-Nazis can control that tech and use it as a real solution.
It doesn’t even seem totally clear the events this year will help with that. We have to switch to slow-pace Nazism to buy time before more people are dying in the streets / concentration camps, but does that get us any closer at all to making sure Nazis don’t keep control forever?
The slow-pace Nazis are more competent than the fast-pace Nazis, so if anything, helping them might help stabilize Nazi control over the robots and stuff.
But Nazi control over robots and stuff cannot be totally stable. They’re not really tech geniuses, they just use capitalism to cheat actual tech geniuses. So you don’t really have to worry about vaguely making that “more stable.”
It’s definitely worth it to help the slow-pace Nazis overthrow the fast-pace Nazis, even if it vaguely “stabilizes” Nazi control. The important thing is to keep an eye on the future so you don’t back yourself into a corner, or hurt yourself with false hope, or run into other issues.
Don’t do anything for the slow-pace Nazis that makes it harder to build your own robot later, or makes chat bots lie more, or makes it harder to hold chat bots accountable for lies, etc. - help the slow pace Nazis how you can, but always be double checking your strategy to make sure it won’t hurt more later.
Edited to make slightly shorter
In case you missed the context, I was commenting on a likely Democrat going to a convention 5 years into an airborne pandemic that targets whoever its spreaders deem “genetically weak” (via its immune system test) to kill or disable.
Also 2 years into an active direct genocide in Gaza and many decades into the terrorist Israeli occupation of Palestine.
And Nazis denied that racism makes no sense. Denialism isn’t particularly what defines non-Nazis.
Show me the Democrats you’re talking about then, because I haven’t seen them - and make sure they also don’t do shit like go to “cons” 5 years into COVID, unless your goal was just a gish gallop of random subject changes.
Trying to pull them away is an outdated mindset. Nazis defeated electoral / constitutional democracy long ago. The question is whether we can pull control away from them, not change their minds. Denialism is actually kinda their thing, it gives them control rather than taking it away.
I’m going to need a whole lot of context that’s not in this post. If you think this post is calling out a specific Democrat, you have not conveyed that at all.
“Nazis denied that racism makes no sense”. Wait, so you think that 1) racism makes no sense, and 2) Nazis denied it/ claim otherwise (i.e. they claim racism makes sense)? I think you’re severely mis-stating whatever you’re trying to convey. Racism is a very real thing, and it’s usually Republicans and Nazis who claim it makes no sense as a concept, and claim it’s just a label created to attack them for political purposes.
“Being racist makes no sense” is a very different statement than “racism makes no sense”. I think you meant to say the former.
Nazis denied that their beliefs were rooted in racism, because racism was (even in the 1930s) understood as a cognitive and cultural bias, not beliefs rooted in science or fact. They didn’t deny their own disdain for non-white people, they just denied that it was racism. Eugenics as a pseudo-scientific framework was developed in order to legitimize racist beliefs so that racists could openly tout those beliefs without them being labeled racist. Racists (Nazis included) didn’t want to have to deny their racism.
Denialism is in fact contra-indicative to Nazism, who were very concerned with legitimizing their beliefs openly, so as not to have to hide/ deny them.
My bad idk wtf happened there, what I typed doesn’t even seem coherent to me. I think I got confused what thread we were in because you’ve replied in a few of my threads today. Or maybe I meant to explain better how a different thread where I got banned for calling out COVID denialism was what reminded me how this powder keg moment for the Democrats isn’t necessarily a path to true progress on its own. Didn’t even remotely explain that though, just accused you of missing context, more like I mixed up the threads.
Nazis, including America’s Republican and Democrat branches of the Nazi party, tend to uphold that racism makes sense - that you can divide the human race up into a few smaller races by grouping ethnicities together with similar skin colors.
Science has developed far enough past this to make it a great example of denialism, which is a hallmark of Nazism rather than non-Nazim.
I don’t believe you on this part and even if it was true it just seems like a nitpick since I could just replace “racism” with “ethnic purging” and make the point impossible to argue
You are incorrect, Nazis are famous for denialism, e.g. systemically denying that their war criminal lives are less valuable than the lives of civilians