Obviously the headings are reminiscent of GenAI, but I’m pretty sure that was intentional. “Aspect” and “SocialAI” mentioned at the end are GenAI-only social networks (i.e. where a human interacts with GenAI agents) which is part of the gag. The author interacts in the comments of that post, tho ofc the text itself could still be generated. I’m guessin it’s like 90% chance it’s human-generated.