• dinckel@lemmy.world
      711·
      1 year ago

      Debugging Typescript without proper tools, in a nutshell. The original file might have 72 lines, but the transpiled JS file it’s debugging is like 3 times that many

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            101·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, you don’t want production to tell users what your exact errors are, and especially not what the source code looks like and where to find the problem exactly.

            Production errors should mostly go “Well, this was on (y)our side, sorry about that” and nothing more.

            • relevants@feddit.de
              5·
              1 year ago

              If it’s in the minified front end code it’s already client side, of course you don’t show it to the user but they could find out if they wanted to. Server side errors are where you really have to watch out not to give out any details, but then logging them is also easier since it’s already on the server.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      26·
      1 year ago

      ugh… this reminds me of a compilation error I got that complained about an unknown character. Looked through the file, didnt notice anything, passed it around for other people to check and no one noticed anything until one person noticed that the quotes were being autocorrected to the straight quotes instead for some fucking reason. I didnt see it because 1) why would that even be a thing and 2) I am almost legally blind without my contacts.

      • TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world
        23·
        1 year ago

        Yep. I use a piece of software that lets me drag components onto a stage and will auto generate code in the back end. We can then add our own code to customize the components.

        I ran into a super cryptic error message while working on a time sensitive project and I was ripping my hair out trying to figure out what the hell was wrong. Turns out someone had pasted some code in from an email and the custom code editor displays the straight quotes and angles quotes exactly the same but the back end code generation fortunately displays them differently. The program didn’t like the character set for the quotes used in Outlook but didn’t give me the proper line number, the error made zero sense, and looking at the code didn’t show that anything was wrong.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          10·
          1 year ago

          Learned the hard way that anything copied from a MS product gets pasted to a plain text editor first. I especially love how SharePoint sprinkles “zero with space” characters liberally throughout.

    • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      3·
      1 year ago

      So I took a Marlin firmware for my 3d printer and just changed values like the bed size and added a BL Touch by uncommenting the specified line and the Visual studio errors out. I don’t get it

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    36·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes I get this when I have unsaved changes to the file or the binary is not in sync with the code PEBKAC, and sometimes its the compiler 🙄

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    28·
    1 year ago

    Ha. I’ve just got a report of “UnknownError at foo in line 162”.

    Line 162: bar();

    Of course, there’s a foo() nearby, and yeah the error is there. C# also has a problem with sourcemaps.

    Anyway, the “UnknownError” is literal from the problem. And also, nothing has any problem at all, but foo() is from a proprietary 3rd party library…

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    25·
    1 year ago

    Kotlin is quite …special in this regard.

    For certain language features, you have to declare functions as inline.
    And when you do that, as far as I can tell, it basically just templates that function at the end of the files where that function is to be used.

    Because well, it suddenly starts to report line numbers in exceptions, which are beyond the end of the file. Which is not helpful, at all.

  • Zarlin@lemmy.world
    14·
    1 year ago

    This can actually be caused by using mixed line endings. Which is a whole new class of horrible.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      191·
      1 year ago

      The error is usually with the line before

      EDIT: could be a missing bracket:

      if (x == 5){
    do_thing();

      or a comparison in place of an assignment:

      x == 5;
    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.orgEnglish
      71·
      1 year ago

      It depends on what you’re using. I see it most often with TypeScript when the source maps are incorrect

      • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
        6·
        1 year ago

        When I forget a semicolon (in languages that like those), it gives the the error on the next line instead of the one that I forgot the semicolon on. It makes sense once you think about it but, man, it trips me up sometimes

        • Knusper@feddit.deEnglish
          6·
          1 year ago

          Definitely also depends on the language. Here’s e.g. Rust, the goddamn overachiever, pointing arrows and everything:

          Often feels like, if you know where it needs to go, why ask me?

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            2·
            1 year ago

            IntelliJ has a setting like that, it’ll auto correct/lint/format files on save. Super useful, except sometimes when it’ll fuck up your entire file because it placed a bracket at the wrong place.

            I’ve had it do that at some point when I forgot a semicolon in Javascript at exactly the wrong position. You see, Javascript can work without semicolons and it’ll automatically add them for you, except in a few cases where you need to be explicit.

            For example:

            const mishmash = 13 + 'world'

[13].length

            This will place the semicolon after the .length, turning the code into const mishmash = 13 + 'world'[13].length.

            In my case, it tried to be smart about inserting a semicolon in an unexpected case, and it turned nested .map() call into something completely unexpected while I hit ctrl+a on unfinished code. Took me a git reset to get something readable out of the that file again!

            As for Rust: using some macros tends to make it suggest baffling syntax alterations sometimes. When you fuck up a macro in such a way that the macro no longer generates correct syntax, you can get the Rust compiler to suggest placing semicolons halfway through statements or even words.

            • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
              2·
              1 year ago

              See, it’s this trying to be overly friendly nonsense I hate about JS. If you need semicolons, demand them. Don’t make it seem like you don’t then make your code break because it hudes that you do. My first orogramming job was at large multinational japanese motor company and they had a hard rule over no in house exe’s or opensource software. So the compromise was doing everything in JS. JS refused to listen to me on doing a single threaded for loop, just run the loop, wait a moment, run the next one, wait a moment…

              JS, don’t help me, just do as I say

          • GamesRevolution@programming.dev
            1·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t rust-analyser have the code suggestions that do fix it for you? It’s not fixing automatically, but it does know where it needs to go and it’s giving you a button that you click and it automatically fixes it

            • Knusper@feddit.de
              3·
              1 year ago

              Oh yeah, it does. I’m not really complaining about fixing it myself. Mostly, I was joking that I felt like I’m unneeded. Rust-analyzer actually being able to fix it on its own, doesn’t help in that sense either. 🙃

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.orgEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          I assumed we weren’t talking “expected semicolon” since that ones pretty explanatory and would never appear on a blank line. That said, it does provide an opportunity to talk about the worst code style I ever saw. A dude decided he wanted semicolons at the start of lines so that compiler error always mapped to the line he would have put the semicolon on

    • Kevin Herrera@beehaw.orgEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      Some thoughts based on personal experience:

      1. File was edited after error was reported, but before investigating it. (Editing, code formatter, etc.)
      2. Build cache was not cleared, so old source was used.
    • Elise@beehaw.org
      1·
      1 year ago

      If you have optimizations enabled this can easily occur due to code being moved around behind the scenes. For example the body of a small function can be inserted where it is called. For example in c# if you get a null ref exception in such inlined code it will actually direct you to the place where the function is called from, rather than its body.

      So if you know, you probably can find the issue. In the worst case just go to debug mode with opti off, or use an attribute on the function to force it not to inline.