• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I try not to predict the future. it took them a long time to get here. I they’e going to loop back around, I can’t see it happening again soon.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not about the explosive growth (or not) of iMessage. It’s a matter of fact about the legal foothold that Apple now holds. That won’t be dislodged anytime soon. Whether or not Apple can get any market growth moving forward, now the EU will have to re-file any efforts to this ruling to them in the future should they try. That is a big deal. And nothing anyone in trying in the EU will move forward anything near the weight this attempt did. 

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What legal foothold, exactly? The conclusion that their messaging service isn’t important enough to negatively affect the market?

          Whether or not Apple can get any market growth moving forward

          If they don’t grow, the EU won’t need to do anything, because the status quo remains.

          And nothing anyone in trying in the EU will move forward anything near the weight this attempt did.

          The commission that did the initial market research is legally obligated to continuously monitor markets. This isn’t a one-off thing, nor was it an “attempt” at anything. If the EU wanted iMessage to be opened up, they would’ve written the law better.

          The DMA is a law to protect against de-facto gatekeepers, and iMessage just isn’t important enough to be called a gatekeeper.