• ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can it use others, and is there a benefit? USB C makes a lot of sense; lower material usage, small, carries data, power and connects to almost everything now.

      • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe USB-C is the only connector supported for carrying DisplayPort signals other than DisplayPort itself.

        The biggest issue with USB-C for display in my opinion is that cable specs vary so much. A cable with a type c end could carry anywhere from 60-10000MB/s and deliver anywhere from 5-240W. What’s worse is that most aren’t labeled, so even if you know what spec you need you’re going to have a hell of a time finding it in a pile of identical black cables.

        Not that I dislike USB-C. It’s a great connector, but the branding of USB has always been a mess.

        • strawberry@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          would be neat to somehow have a standard color coding. kinda how USB 3 is (usually) blue, maybe there could be thin bands of color on the connector?

          better yet, maybe some raised bumps so visually impaired people could feel what type it was. for example one dot is USB 2, two could be USB 3, etc

          • Flipper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you looked at the naming of the usb standards? No you havn’t otherwise you wouldn’t make this sensible suggestion.