Ukraine on Wednesday lowered the military conscription age from 27 to 25 in an effort to replenish its depleted ranks after more than two years of war following Russia’s full-scale invasion.

The new mobilization law came into force a day after Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed it. Ukraine’s parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, passed it last year.

It was not immediately clear why Zelenskyy took so long to sign the measure into law. He didn’t make any public comment about it, and officials did not say how many new soldiers the country expected to gain or for which units.

Conscription has been a sensitive matter in Ukraine for many months amid a growing shortage of infantry on top of a severe ammunition shortfall that has handed Russia the battlefield initiative. Russia’s own problems with manpower and planning have so far prevented it from taking full advantage of its edge.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Not OP, but I, for one, would rather see that than a bunch of kids dying in the trenches. But better yet, secure the current border, start ceasefire and do the talking. Ukraine did gain leverage enough not to give up Kyiv or its statehood, something that was seen even by the way Russia approached peace talk suggestions over the months of the war.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’ll never be enough. Don’t forget that Russia already conquered part of Ukraine with Crimea. History shows they won’t stop after getting another chunk of Ukraine.

        Not to mention Russia was already bound diplomatically to defend Ukraine as part of the Budapest Memorandum. The USSR agreed to protect their sovereignty, and Russia has laid claim as the successor of the USSR – hence why they have the USSR seat on the UN security council.

        Russia has shown that any treaty is temporary and that they will violate it when they feel like.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Which is exactly why NATO should be involved in the talks and provide its own guarantees.

          No one will trust Russia on that, and rightfully so.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Only way to make sure Russia doesn’t attack again is to stick NATO forces on the Ukrainian border with guns pointed at them the whole time, and a “do not cross” line that is strictly enforced.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Why not? Let them stay on the border - with respect to Russian defensive interests, that is, i.e. do not accumulate a massive army right there