• Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What the hell are you talking about, there are infinite ways to draw a fire dog, Pokemon alone has like 5 of them (at least 2 of which “inspired” Pals lol) When you take into account all the kind of dogs there are and the infinite flourishes an artist could make its shocking anyone would think their design doesn’t look like a rippof. One might even say thar someone is arguing in bad faith again.

    Just… come on now.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just because you don’t like the argument doesn’t make it bad faith. Considering that 100% of pals are distinctly different enough that Nintendo cannot go after them and win is sufficient evidence that they’ve made enough of the “infinite flourishes” you claim to exist. Yet here you are claiming that they’re ripoffs.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Didn’t we just go over this? You’re right, we are in a loop.

          Yup… Because the only opinion that matters is Nintendo’s and a courts. Not yours. But you don’t seem to recognize this.

          You don’t have to like it or buy the game. Not sure why people like you love to sit there and make claims that PalWorld is a problem when clearly it’s not. The loop will end when you recognize that fact and move on. Stop being one of those people that backseat lawyers on behalf of a mega-corp.