• taanegl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Why not? Because they’ve done this before and it’s getting ridiculous. The process goes thusly.

    1. Isreal announces a ceasefire plan they are sure Palestinians will reject
    2. Palestinian officials accepts the ceasefire
    3. Isreal goes “Well screw it then, now I don’t want to do it” and continues their genocidal ways.

    And so on, and so forth.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The plan they rejected was made by Egypt and… Qatar (maybe)

      Definitely not one of their own proposals.

      So your argument here is false.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Israeli officials charged that its terms were “far from” their “obligatory demands.”

    Those Israeli obligatory demands being starving and killing thousands of civilian men, women and children in Rafah.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah, pretty much. This story goes into some details. If that’s accurate, then the objections the Israelis have to the current plan boil down to:

      • They want the deal to allow them to keep fighting the war and keep troops in Gaza (after its terms are fully implemented, which generally isn’t how a cease fire works)
      • They want to be able to keep Palestinians they have (“Iraeli veto over prisoners”) while demanding the fast release of all Israelis that Hamas has (“Hamas has suggested a framework that would stretch out the hostage release”)

      This little section I think gets to the heart of it:

      Israel has consistently opposed any deal that explicitly calls for a permanent cease-fire or an end to the war, and has said it would not agree to either until it felt its military offensive had achieved its goals. Ehud Yaari, an Israel-based fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said that the Hamas timetable would commit Israel to ending the war while Hamas still holds hostages, leaving Israel without any leverage.

      It’s a very cunning little construction. The deal involves the release of all hostages, of course, in exchange for the end of the war. He’s placing “commit Israel to ending the war” (after the deal) next to “Hamas still holds hostages” (before the deal) and getting all upset that they can’t have the benefits of the deal before agreeing to their side of it, and also they want to avoid having to uphold substantive parts after agreeing to it.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Hamas must be deposed for meaningful safety, they’ve said they want to do October 7th over and over again. This is a last minute deal for them to try and weasel their way out of ultimate consequences for what they have done.

        Occupying Gaza is probably also a good call considering their unilateral withdrawal arguably led directly to October 7th. I expect they will stay, try to implement a puppet government, do a little nation building, and only leave once Gaza is pacified. If this is not possible, expect more annexations and settlements.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Hamas must be deposed for meaningful safety

          Likud materially supports Hamas, in my opinion specifically because of their propensity for violence that was useful to Likud’s goals of sabotaging the peace process.

          1. Increasing the violence and repression as a solution to terrorism hasn’t been working for decades in Israel; it’s unlikely that doing more of it would suddenly start working now
          2. Your whole premise that Netanyahu is aiming to increase the safety of the Israelis is totally at odds with his actual behavior
          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, they tried to divide and conquer but it backfired, I don’t think they’re doing that anymore.

            • Hegar@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s not divide and conquer, that implies keeping multiple groups at parity and fighting each other. Israel intentionally kept the crazies in charge to undermine the viability of a Palestinian state.

        • Hegar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Our fundamentally inhuman treatment of the Palestinian people led to October 7.

          There are only two ways to prevent it happening again. We could stop the unconscionable deprivations we inflict on the Palestinian people or we could speed up the genocide we’ve been engaged in.

          No surprises that the government compromised of war criminals and people the Israeli courts have deemed to be terrorists are going for the later. The far right are in charge and they’re pretty open that this is the goal.

          • applepie@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Is there any chance for this to change course short of US withdrawing support?

            Or are we just gonna have to see this shit real time and then pretend never again, again?

            • Hegar@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I doubt it will change even if the US withdraws support, but I’m a cynical depressive type.

              • applepie@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                They sure got the ability to ear Gaza and west bank by themselves but loss of US support would make their geopolitical situation untenable mid to long term. That’s my thinking and common understanding in geopolitical circles.

                Is Israel government and military deranged enough to think they can go forward on their own?

  • applepie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    At this point IDF can rape your family and biden would imprison you for anti semeticism for bringing it up.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      biden

      * congress, and maybe your local police force depending on which university you go to

      would imprison you for anti semeticism

      * would pass a resolution vaguely implying that you’re anti Semitic

      for bringing it up

      * for having a weekslong protest about it

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          If “accused” means “charged” then absolutely not. Local police have, as they generally do, charged protestors with some selected kinds of nonsense whether technically-valid or not, in addition to just roughing them up and arresting them and then admitting they didn’t do anything wrong and letting them go.

          The federal government has bought into a certain amount of the propaganda and said some ignorant shit, and hasn’t been doing much to discourage the police from doing that, but as far as I’m aware, “antisemitism” in the current propaganda construction is still perfectly legal and likely to remain so (whatever non-binding resolutions congress wants to make about it.)

            • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              The Tucker Carlson thing only works when you can Just Ask Questions in a place where people can’t ackshually provide the answer.

              • applepie@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Trucker? Why is u looping in pootin’s lapdog here?

                While my statement was hyperbolic, your additional context doesn’t make it look any better but I do appreciate the input so people can see for themselves :)

                • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I looped in Tucker because it kinda looked like you asked a question implying a certain answer, and then tried to make fun of me when I provided the answer (which was different than the one you implied).

                  No?

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I can accuse you of all sorts of things, like being “anti-semiticist.” That doesn’t mean much. If you don’t see the distinction between that and being charged with an actual crime then there isn’t much I can do to help you here.