• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Making shit up IS a feature of LLMs. It’s crazy to use it as search engine. Now they’ll try to stop it from hallucinating to make it a better search engine and kill the one thing it’s good at …

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe they should branch it off. Have one for making shit up purposes and one for search engine. I haven’t found the need for one that makes shit up but have gotten value using them to search. Especially with Google going to shit and so many websites being terribly designed and hard to navigate.

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Chatgpt was in much higher quality a year ago than it is now.

      It could be very accurate. Now it’s hallucinating the whole time.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was thinking the same thing. LLMs have suddenly got much worse. They’ve lost the plot lmao

        • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s because of the concerted effort to sabotage LLMs by poisoning their data.

          • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m not sure thats definitely true… my sense is that the AI money/arms race has made them push out new/more as fast as possible so they can be the first and get literally billions of investment capitol

            • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe. I’m sure there’s more than one reason. But the negativity people have for AI is really toxic.

                • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  People aren’t being critical. At least most are. They’re just being haters tbh. But we can argue this till the cows come home, and it’s not gonna change either of our minds, so let’s just not.

                  • mriormro@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    16
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    You simply choosing to ignore valid criticisms and hand waving them away as people “just being haters” does not make it so.

                    We’re not arguing. I’m just pointing out your own bias.

              • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                is it?

                nearly everyone I speak to about it (other than one friend I have who’s pretty far on the spectrum) concur that no one asked for this. few people want any of it, its consuming vast amounts of energy, is being shoehorned into programs like skype and adobe reader where no one wants it, is very, very soon to become manditory in OS’s like windows, iOS and Android while it threatens election integrity already (mosdt notibly India) and is being used to harass individuals with deepfake porn etc.

                the ethics board at openAI got essentially got dispelled and replaced by people interested only in the fastest expansion and rollout possible to beat the competition and maximize their capitol gains…

                …also AI “art”, which is essentially taking everything a human has ever made, shredding it into confetti and reconsstructing it in the shape of something resembling the prompt is starting to flood Image search with its grotesque human-mimicing outputs like things with melting, split pupils and 7 fingers…

                you’re saying people should be positive about all this?

                • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re cherry picking the negative points only, just to lure me into an argument. Like all tech, there’s definitely good and bad. Also, the fact that you’re implying you need to be “pretty far on the spectrum” to think this is good is kinda troubling.

                  • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I didnt say you need to be autistic to like AI, I said the only person I know who is enthusiastic about AI is on the spectrum.

                    I listed half a dozen things off of the top of my head that are cearly negatives. What good things are coming out of this?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            7 months ago

            The only people poisoning the data set are the makers who insist on using Reddit content