[🌽].pop() == 🍿"🚴".push() = "🚲🤸"
Best I can do is
"\ude41🙂".split("").reverse().join("")returns
"\ude42🙁""☹️".reverse() == "☹️"wasn’t it
🙁
.
r
e
v
e
r
s
e
()"
🙂
"
.
r
e
v
e
r
s
e
(
)
=
"
🙃
"deleted by creator
Be the operator overload you wish to see in the world
deleted by creator
“:-)”.reverse() == “)-:”
Close enough
JavaScript taking notes
"🐈".concat() = "😼"Then “b” backwards would have to be “d”
"E".reverse() == "∃"
Today I found out that this is valid JS:
const someString = "test string"; console.log(someString.toString());[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
I dint know many OO languages that don’t have a useless toString on string types
Okay, fair enough. Guess I never found about it because I never had to do it… JS also allows for
"test string".toString()directly, not sure how it goes in other languages.It’s also incredibly useful as a failsafe in a helper method where you need the argument to be a string but someone might pass in something that is sort of a string. Lets you be a little more flexible in how your method gets called
Also, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
Calling
reverse()on a function should return its inverseisprime.reverse(True) // outputs 19 billion prime numbers. Checkmate, atheists.
You could implement that on a chat, but I wouldn’t do that on a string
Where’s your sense of adventure?!
