Demystifying the rumors that most console players only care about graphics.

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not like console gamers were ever given a choice, but PC gamers kept wanting PC ports for more frames over the 30 fps standard. Graphics were already good during the PS4 era and PS5 is still crutching so hard on PS4 games during their PS5 pro showcasing. Now console users wanting the same after finally getting the option over a decade later I think shows they aren’t too different from PC gamers in loving frames.

    • caut_R@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That sends me back to when people in online discussions regularly claimed anything above 60 fps is pointless because the human eye can‘t see more than that anyway

      • TotesIllegit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That claim is such a pet peeve of mine. That’s not even how our eyes work, and it’s demonstrably untrue.

        It can even be proven false by rapidly moving the mouse cursor across the screen very quickly and the lack of motion blur.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Even of the eye notices it, it’s not really a big deal most of the time unless you play some real time multiplayer game, and going from 60 to 120 literally doubles the amount of frames that the GPU needs to process, thus raising the GPU requirement for no fucking reason 99% of the time.