• g0nz0li0@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    232
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitter no longer has a media relations department. The company responded to a request for comment with a poop emoji.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Financially and literally please. I hear there’s an area with a lot of sunflowers that need fertilizer.

    • Frisbeedude@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The level of professionalism from this company is astounding…how in the world is anyone doing business with them? All the news from this kindergarten are not even funny anymore.

      • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        122
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just news. And nowadays this just means it’s panic and excessive exaggeration and a pinch of populism.

        Since the company is now in private hands of only one person, there is no need to paint a picture for the public. And with the efforts of making it more economical, there are of course hurdles to overcome.

        But overall most decisions were reasonable. The provider change and the change to the financial model were reasonable and will eventually lead to more profits, also with a smaller team behind the platform.

        Many here want to see the company fall, just because a person is bought it that’ll whom they despise. That’s just childish.

        The only bad decision on musks way so far was buying twitter for simply too much. And the second worst decision was shooting a shitty car into space. Now the aliens will believe us to have no standards.

            • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think this covered it well:

              But overall most decisions were reasonable. The provider change and the change to the financial model were reasonable and will eventually lead to more profits, also with a smaller team behind the platform.

              • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                A smaller team as a reasonable thing doesn’t mean that I think it’s reasonable to not pay employees that are owed.

                But a company is not owed to employ someone.

                • lps2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  He slashed damn near 2/3 of the company, their HRIS systems were in disarray, they removed much of the force that made it advertiser friendly, came up with obscene API pricing (no doubt to try and cash in on LLM companies), and have failed to pay rent and server costs. Elon took a flawed business model and made it significantly worse all while giving a middle finger to their advertisers which is overwhelmingly their primary revenue source.

                  • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And that’s just not correct. Twitter is still running. It has still grown in username in the last months. Their business model expanded to a subscription model.

                    And all this talk about servers and api is just crap talk of unhappy people that do not know how a company is made profitable. It’s the same kind of people that are angry about Reddit and believe Reddit to go bankrupt. What a joke.

              • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh no, I get called a bootlicker and oh no, downwards pointing arrows are clicked on my comments by people without knowledge about economics.

                I feel like walking into a group of Scientologists, trying to explain them Quantum Mechanics.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          1 year ago

          Paying severance isn’t a “hurdle” to “overcome,” it’s the cost of doing business. Not paying for things you have to pay for is not overcoming a hurdle. It’s running into it and continuing to run.

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            73
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am just trying to explain basic economy to a bunch of angry emotional people. But you are of course free to believe that everything would be better without people like musk.

            • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              46
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am just trying to explain basic economy to a bunch of angry emotional people.

              You are trying to sound superior, and it is not going well.

                • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  28
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Blah balh blah. Look at what a smart person I am… (anyone that has to tell you how smart they are is not.)

                  • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    42
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I am not especially smart. I am just better educated than you ;)

                    Knowledge and intelligence are not the same. I am actually rather on the slow side. That’s why I need to compensate with knowledge.

        • cassetti@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, well, well, look who’s defending their beloved billionaire. It’s truly fascinating how some people can overlook glaring issues and defend questionable decisions. Let’s dissect your defense, shall we?

          Firstly, you claim that since Twitter is now in private hands, there’s no need to paint a picture for the public. Ah, yes, because transparency and accountability are such outdated concepts, right? Who needs the public’s trust when one person can make all the decisions behind closed doors? It’s not like Twitter is a platform that millions of people rely on for news, communication, and information.

          You also applaud the efforts to make the platform more economical, but conveniently ignore the consequences. Sure, reducing the team might save some money, but what about the impact on content moderation? By firing a significant number of content moderation staff, Twitter has allowed extremist content to flourish, tarnishing its reputation and driving away advertisers. But hey, who needs ad revenue when you have a billionaire at the helm, right?

          Speaking of advertisers, you seem to brush off the importance of brand safety and the impact of hate speech on ad placements. Advertisers understandably don’t want their brands associated with extremist views or hate speech. By failing to address this issue effectively, Musk has driven away advertisers, causing a significant loss of revenue for Twitter. It’s not “childish” for people to criticize such negligence; it’s simply holding a company accountable for its actions.

          And let’s not forget Musk’s refusal to pay rent on Twitter’s offices. It’s truly admirable how he thinks he can just disregard contractual obligations and leave property owners high and dry. Such behavior shows a complete disregard for the law and basic decency.

          Oh, and the whole bedroom installation in the San Francisco headquarters? That’s just downright creepy. Who in their right mind thinks it’s acceptable to convert a commercial space into a residential one without proper zoning? Musk’s actions in this regard are not only inappropriate but also demonstrate a lack of respect for regulations and the communities in which his company operates.

          While it’s true that many billionaires own media outlets, that doesn’t excuse Musk’s questionable decisions and mismanagement. Controlling the narrative should never come at the expense of allowing hate speech and extremism to run rampant. Musk’s actions on Twitter are not the signs of a genius businessman; they’re the actions of someone more interested in their own ego and power.

          So, before you rush to defend your beloved Musk, take a step back and consider the real consequences of his decisions. Twitter deserves better leadership and accountability, not blind adoration from its defenders.

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            45
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh man. I just answered you to every point and then the Memmy app crashed. And my comment in the making was gone.

            I am not willing to repeat everything in a foreign language.

            We will not agree anyway.

            The world will continue to spin around. And platforms will come and go over the years.

            Good and bad is a matter of taste. And who are we to degrade another’s taste as bad…

        • gd42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Half the time a site just refuses to work. I click on a link to a tweet, and it’s either “Ooops…” or a sign in window. This can’t be good for a social media site, that mainly gets its value from the number of users. Disregarding laws in Europe regarding the firings is also a very shortsigthed decision that will bite them in the ass.

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            36
            ·
            1 year ago

            Half the time a site just refuses to work. I click on a link to a tweet, and it’s either “Ooops…” or a sign in window.

            The links not working might be connected to the provider change. But so had no such experiences so far. The forced login to see content is actually something Facebook and other companies already do. It forces people to make an account. This always works out in favour of a company, if the company already has a very large amount of users and has a monopoly on the market.

            This can’t be good for a social media site, that mainly gets its value from the number of users.

            This works especially well with media. Newspapers that embed tweets must link them In their articles, often embedded in an article. This means the newspaper will need more than the current 600 tweets a day to work. It will need to pay to make use of 6000. This concept only works if you need to login to see tweets.

            Disregarding laws in Europe regarding the firings is also a very shortsigthed decision that will bite them in the ass.

            I am uninformed about the firings of European twitter personnel. You might be right about that. Or it’s just an inflated problem. Twitter still has a legal team.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many here want to see the company fall, just because a person is bought it that’ll whom they despise. That’s just childish.

          The only bad decision on musks way so far was buying twitter for simply too much.

          What the actual fuck???

          Not paying bills, rent, employees’ severance and bonuses? This has real consequences for ordinary people who aren’t asshole billionaires. I don’t think anyone here wants the company to fail because they despise him. We want it to fail because he’s a terrible person doing terrible things.

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hold on. A company is not always bound to pay all those things. It’s always a legal question. And while the media makes a big deal out of it, the severance and bonuses claims are still just lawsuit claims.

            And to my knowledge, many of those claims are still questionable.

            • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And to my knowledge, many of those claims are still questionable.

              Since when are service bills and rent questionable after they’ve been rendered?

            • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea it’s legal question. If you break the contract they will get their lawyers. It’s as simple as that. And you will probably loose that trial.

              • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Exactly. And now the question is, if the contract was broken or not. To my knowledge Musk didn’t fire twitters legal team. So letting some employees go, should have been looked I to by said legal team.

        • graphite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What about the severance for those employees?

          I think it’s important to be critical; Musk is someone who I tend to be neutral with, and I refuse to align myself with the “eLoN MuSk bad!!!” crowd, because I’m a fucking adult.

          • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not supporting criminal actions. If severance is owed, than it must be payed.

            But that doesn’t mean that musk cannot juristically look into it. Not everyone is entitled to severance.