• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The number of users who posted AI-generated images in response is just saddening. The whole point of the post was to see the many facets of human imagination, and those users had absolutely nothing to say but just had to say something anyway.

    Pretty much all the ones that people actually drew themselves were great and very creative.

    • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think one interesting facet of the AI art thing is that the bar for “genuine meaningful content” really drops. I think lots of people are/were too intimidated to post their personal creations on the Internet because until now that type of content was dominated by the skilled artists out there. But now, since anyone can go make a half decent AI art thing, suddenly any actual human generated content gains way more meaning, regardless of skill

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, maybe. Personally, I haven’t seen one AI generated image ever that doesn’t look “wrong” and offputting.

        All I can say to those people is that I’m one of you; I’m terrible at drawing but have learned to embrace it as a unique style. I can only speak for myself, but I’d rather see the crudest photoshop than some mostly pixel perfect AI-generated abomination.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          personally i enjoyed the attempts to “ai over” the really bad-on-purpose ones because that just made the ai fuck up even harder. it becomes performance art at that point.